There's a soccer club there giving a ludicrous amount of money for 'past his prime' Becks isn't there?
There's a lot of money in soccer there now and it shows in their consistent World Cup qualifying. So big business in the US is soccer friendly and the sport is obviously picking up although it will never be number one there. But does it have to be?
Firstly note what t-ba highlights.
I don't mind soccer, playing it is fun, but as a spectator, at the highest professional (overly defensive) level, TV wise , it mostly sucks. The amount of times I've set myself to watch a game and come away disappointed ranks at about the equivalent of Rugby Union @ 85%.
I very much enjoyed the Aussies ride through the world cup, but my eyes bled when I tried to watch the other super powers plying their boring trade.
There is no doubt Soccer is better live than on TV, but I've never been a huge fan of games that allows the ball to do most of the work ( e.g. I'm a huge boxing fan).
Now the other posting was basically implying that because it's bigger it's better, well you can shove that theory up your puppet like ass.
NSW and QLD people, having been involved in 4 codes for long periods seem to me to be the best judges of what is good and bad. And a healthy percentage know that League is sh*t hot compared to the other sports.....even after 100 years of propaganda heavily weighted against League (and has intensified in the last 10).