Skinner
Coach
- Messages
- 13,581
But if i was the recruit guy aka John Hart i would go for Paea A no brainer
That is exactly why they won't move for him....;-)
But if i was the recruit guy aka John Hart i would go for Paea A no brainer
I condemning based on the majority of the performance this year bar his first and second game. While the tigers dont have the most rated pack in the comp when galloway and payten come back theyll not too bad pack of forwards.
Im referring to the Warriors game because perhaps some guys would have actually watched it. Vs brisbane tigers pack despite major injuries went fine head went M.I.A. Head should be the controlling the tigers he is not while people are bagging benji he shouldnt be the one getting the ball all the time.
He cant tackles and doesnt run at the line doesnt matter if he had the roosters forward pack that aint going to change.
As for Paea he needs an opporunity to develop and an opportunity to take over a team. Excuse Paea he never had a chance against a team going so sh*t.
Matt head has been playing ever since he has come back from injury Paea got a few games before he dropped to improve his kicking game for a nuffies like Smith, Widders, Rogers who have a no kicking game.
Hattrickrabbit
its nice to hear someone that is being honest about a player without it sounding personal. It is surprising to hear that a player volunteers to go down a grade so that he can shine/look good - does that sound like he is ready, or will ever be ready? How long has he been over in Australian system?
I understand but its hard to compare Sandow and Paea performance in the NRL purely on what we have seen so far.It was never the club's decision to drop Paea after Round 4, Paea realised he was far from ready for the top grade, and decided to voluntarily play against who he thought he could excel against.
Paea is still far from NRL capable, He struggles to build the stamina to play 80 minutes and he seems to go missing after about 30, due to him struggling to keep with the pace, His defensive issues are also pretty negative at the moment as well.
Has potential but we arent willing to take a long-term risk on re-signing a player who we have nothing to go on, that he will produce into a Solid Player, He has had plenty of time to prove himself, and has failed to do so.
If Paea is streets ahead of Issac John in being ready for first-grade, then god help the Warriors, obviously you are not keen on Rovelli, and you are playing a hooker as a halfback atm.
If you can pick him up cheap, then it may be a good buy but I certainly have my doubts.
I think it was the right decision to let him go from the Rabbitohs board, and Certainly Sandow is better, more focused and ready for first grade than Paea has ever been in his few chances to crack through.
There will be a new batch of Under 20's talent for every team next year, coming through SG Ball or Bartercard Cup (In your circumstance), and there is always a chance that a young halfback will have the potential to crack first grade or go on to better things.
You dont think head will sign for the warriors. What reports have you been reading?? Tigers havent even tabled him an offer. If the warriors dont sign him he probably wont even be playing NRL next year.Paea wouldn't be a bad signing, but I'd only take him if Head didn't sign (which I don't think he will by all reports.)
Hven't heard an arguements to convince me otherwise.
Yeah but so does Matty Head. At least Paea is young enough for that to improve.He cant tackle at an NRL level and he has to be hidden away in defence.
He can attack and has all of those skills.
This young fella is our future Kiwi number 7, regardless of who picks him up.
including tonga......:lol:
you set em' up skinner and i'll knock em' down:lol: