Bolgeel
Juniors
- Messages
- 278
No offense but u have no idea, centre and wing are the hardest positions to defend in rlyour tall players need to be on the wing in the red zone no doubt.
No offense but u have no idea, centre and wing are the hardest positions to defend in rlyour tall players need to be on the wing in the red zone no doubt.
Obviously the hardest position to defend in is the halves. Just look at all the tackles they miss!No offense but u have no idea, centre and wing are the hardest positions to defend in rl
Who wants to be a half, every team targets them all game with their big boppers...no thanksObviously the hardest position to defend in is the halves. Just look at all the tackles they miss!
They're in demand. The good ones must be doing something right.Who wants to be a half, every team targets them all game with their big boppers...no thanks
I’d like their cashThey're in demand. The good ones must be doing something right.
This is just a narrative built on correlation. There is no proof of causality. No winger is worth 12 wins and 200+ points differential.I think Semi's performances made most of our players look good, but in reality they were fairly average and it was exposed upon his departure.
Because they have been exposed as attitude risks. Plus it's unlikely they want to pay as much as we want them to pay.Before him, The Plane covered some deficiencies when he was on the field.
It's telling that no other club really seems to want a bar of some of our so-called decent players.
what do we expect, we have him in the middle tackling monsters. Why would you have your most important passer tackling monsters? And in a position where we have zero depth as well.
No offence but u have no idea, centre and wing are the hardest positions to defend in rl
You want him efending our wide where he will have to make more one-on-one tackles? You’re saying he’s too small, yet you want him tackling second rowers, centres and wingers by himself?
You have to have good judgement defending on the wing but wingers seem to be fairly bad at it because they are usually big dopey athletes with no vision or anticipation. Thats one of the reason I think the halves are better suited to defend there.
In defence of all the people who bag sandow, he was far far far from greatThe words "Sandow", "great", and "defence" should never be uttered together, unless the words "when he could be arsed to try to tackle" are punctuating that phrase.
Sandow was utter garbage defensively, because his attitude sucked.
This is just a narrative built on correlation. There is no proof of causality. No winger is worth 12 wins and 200+ points differential.
Because they have been exposed as attitude risks. Plus it's unlikely they want to pay as much as we want them to pay.
Yes, these little guys are fine at making a one on one bootlace tackle every now and then (Sandow for example was great usually) the problem they have is those types of tackles are an error in the middle of the field and give up fast play the balls. The little guys also get dominated in wrestle. They also don't get enough of a breather in the middle.
The difference is that I don’t pretend there’s proof. I argue all sides where required, because all sides are valid. Call it circular logic or backflips if it makes you feel better.There's no proof to most of the stuff you post either.
Carry on...
Really? A lot of the time wingers have a 2 on 1 situation to defend, it’s almost impossible to defend against, so of course they will look like poor defenders, but a lot of the time it’s not their fault but inside defender not making the right call.
This Gennings looked like a poor defender at times, but gee mennings made some poor decisions and tackles.
No he wasn’t. He was ducking rubbish at any part of the game where he didn’t have the ball in his hands (and quite often rubbish then as well).
Defending on an edge is the hardest spot to defend in.