Losing the bears wasn’t the problem, Sydney’s lack of vision, nswrl lack of leadership and the lack of ambition of the surounding clubs was.
No reason one of the many surrounding clubs couldn’t have stepped in and taken the area on to ensure RL kept thriving.
the game doesn’t need a club in every Sydney suburb to be relevant youve literally got roosters, manly and eels regions all within spitting distance of the north Sydney region.
To be fair, it makes absolutely no sense not to have a side in NS if you are going to have 9 clubs, more than half your competition, based in Sydney. Which, BTW, is an opinion that Dr Fujak more or less shares, and states as such in his book.
If any planning, or basic rational logic, went into the rationalisation of Sydney after the unification then the strategic value of the major markets of Sydney would have been taken into account, and as a result the Bears probably never would have been in danger of getting the flick. At the very least they should have been replaced with a fulltime presence in NS, but it probably would have been easier to leave them be and get rid of another smaller club whose region could have been more easily covered.
That is a whole other argument though, and I'm ignoring the fact that the Bears were relocating to the CC at the time for simplicity's sake.