If it's basic logic then why doesn't the region of Sydney with the highest interest in RL (the Central Coast) have an NRL side, while 3 of the bottom 5 with the lowest interest in RL have NRL Clubs directly representing them?
If North Sydney losing the Bears is the sole reasons why interest in RL in North Sydney is so low, then why does what data we have from pre-1999 suggest that RL was always more popular on the Northern Beaches than NS, and that RL was probably always under the average rate of popularity in NS at least post WWII?
Could it be that there're more factors, such as gentrification, immigration rates, dollars invested in the region, facilities, population density, etc, etc, that Dr Fujak touches on but you are ignoring because it's inconvenient to your argument?!
You are honestly the most bad faith and intellectually dishonest person I've ever encountered. You proved your position wrong with your own citation, yet here you are pretending it never happened because it doesn't suit your agenda.