For once I completely agree with Phil Gould -
http://rugbyheaven.smh.com.au/articles/2003/02/22/1045638542777.html <h1>Wara waste of two tremendous talents</HEADLINE><o
></o
></h1> <span>By Phil Gould
</BYLINE></span><st1:date Month="2" Day="23" Year="2003"><span><DATE>Sunday, February 23, 2003</span></st1:date><span><o
></o
></span></DATE> <span><o
></o
></span> To suggest that the NSW Waratahs contains as many as eight rugby league converts is stretching the imagination to the extreme. <o
></o
> I went to the Super 12 rugby on Friday night to watch Mat Rogers and Lote Tuqiri. After all, these are the only two "leaguies" in the Waratahs squad who have actually made it in rugby league. <o
></o
> I do not include Nathan Blacklock in that analysis. He was not named in the team for Friday night. <o
></o
> Duncan McRae, who played five-eighth for the Waratahs, never reached his potential in rugby league. He has talent but there is little calmness or control about his football. He does well for the Waratahs but he is not a rugby league halfback or five-eighth. <o
></o
> Ryan McGoldrick, Paul Sheedy, Omar Hassanein, Milton Thaiday and Rocky Elsom? Well, they really haven't played league long enough, or at a high enough level, to call them league converts. They represent the more speculative-type purchases made by the Australian Rugby Union. This highlights yet again the lack of junior development in that sport. Anyway, I went to the Super 12 to watch Mat and Lote, not to incite a code war of words. <o
></o
> Rogers and Tuqiri are great athletes and wonderful footballers. It was a shame to see them change codes. <o
></o
> After watching the game on Friday night, the one thing I am convinced of is that rugby and rugby league are now totally different games. <o
></o
> People say the games are getting closer together. That's rubbish. They are getting further apart. <o
></o
> Trying to compare Tuqiri or Rogers as a rugby player to his status as a league player is a fruitless exercise saved only for the journalist looking to score points on a rival code's image. <o
></o
> The other thing I learned is that if Matt Burke had switched to rugby league a few years ago he would have made it big time. He is a really good footballer. <o
></o
> Wendell Sailor, Mat and Lote could do a lot worse than just watch how he plays if they are looking for tips on how to make it in rugby. <o
></o
> Lote looked lost on Friday night which, in fairness to all concerned, is only to be expected. Rogers seemed far more at ease but still I doubt whether he is totally suited to this style of game. <o
></o
> The bottom line is they are great league players and they will never play that way again in rugby because they do not have the team infrastructure or creative talent around them they enjoyed in league. <o
></o
> To succeed in rugby they will have to become different types of players. <o
></o
> Playing fullback or wing in league is an entirely different work space from playing the same position in rugby. The talented outside backs in league have a working relationship and understanding with just about every other position in the team. <o
></o
> There are plenty of people to create opportunities and, let's face it, league works in sets of six tackles where patterns and plays are planned and rehearsed and pressure is built over a period of time. <o
></o
> In rugby there is nowhere near the scope of creativity in other players in the team and there is less chance to build pressure or plan attacking raids because of all the technical stoppages that prevent continuity. <o
></o
> Not that there's anything wrong with that. It's just that we have to keep this in mind when comparing codes. <o
></o
> For mine, Tuqiri and Rogers - and Sailor, for that matter - don't see enough of the ball and they certainly don't get it in good position to show their talents. <o
></o
> Most rugby teams employ a fast-moving slide defence on long-side plays but I have seen few teams adept at attacking against such a defensive structure. <o
></o
> The players who suffer as a result are the talented players out wide. <o
></o
> The nature of the game and the importance of the kick in rugby also make them reluctant to back themselves. There was one moment on Friday night when Rogers went back to field a kick in his own quarter. Tuqiri dropped back in support and the opportunity was there for the two to link up and run the ball but Rogers kicked because this is the more simple and expected option. In league they have to run the ball and this is where they made their names. <o
></o
> I sat behind the goalposts on Friday night and I have to say my general feeling during the game was one of frustration. <o
></o
></BOD>