Modern-day structures - a supervisor is the first point of contact who overlooks the goings-on of the team. The manager (yours truly), works behind the scenes and does other stuff such as keeping tabs on all accounts, and if need be, client liaison etc...How are you their manager but not their supervisor?
Also, what happened to the ducks?
and does this supervisor report to you?
Hoppity. With 2 p's.
Modern-day structures - a supervisor is the first point of contact who overlooks the goings-on of the team. The manager (yours truly), works behind the scenes and does other stuff such as keeping tabs on all accounts, and if need be, client liaison etc...
In the event that an employee is not satisfied with the outcome directed by the supervisor, they can then escalate things to me for further clarification - which is what happened this morning.
Above me is the area manager, and he reports to the GM (GM being a board member).
Really, no employee can escalate something above me unless they're willing to take legal action against the company - which has happened once.
isn't it the role of an effective manager to ensure that subordinates are made aware of issues that are negatively impacting the productivity of the organisation and to develop plans and actions to negate these, so that there are not repeat occurrences?
Just from what's been quoted, BF is either a liar or the single worst manager of all time.
See, this is what happens when the casino is open:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/philadelphia-casino-winner-robbed-13-000-article-1.2225541
Alba?
Negative.Just from what's been quoted, BF is either a liar or the single worst manager of all time.
Their supervisor is doing her job correctly. Now, they are not happy with her earlier answer as to why their work was not completed by other team members on Friday, and I gave her a directive to ensure no one in the team cops their slack (which would've made the rest of the team happy, considering). She did this. One employee wasn't happy with this, then they came to me and I told them the reason why it wasn't done. To this, he had no answer which alone indicates I was correct.so, what you're saying is your subordinate's subordinates are not doing their job correctly..
which means that the supervisor, someone who you manage, is negatively impacting the business by their inability to do their tasks..
to which i raise my earlier point:
She is - see above.Both BF's posts are rubbish.
If your direct report is not managing their direct reports correctly, then you're not managing your direct report properly. Which means you're at fault.
my point is not around the act itself, don't care how it went down..
my point is regarding that you say this is a repeat occurrence - had this been fixed the first time, we wouldn't be hearing about the story again...
:lol:!!!!
BF: I are gr8 komunk8r bcs i duz teh bear minimim xpcted ov teh magr!!!
If it was the same employee perhaps, but not in this case. The last person who took legal action against the company has since left after his case was thrown out the window.
I know it sounds cliche but COMMUNICATION isn't a term I just throw around the office here for the sack of sounding professional, I ensure that communication is being put to practice by:
- Use of provided mobile phone
- Use of laptop
- Use of email and email messaging system
- Weekly debrief team meetings
- Fortnightly roundtable team meetings
- Informal liaison
you missed "monday morning potato sack races" from your list..
I rock back onto campus and get hailed with 'welcome back' and 'I hear you're leaving us' like I'm a celebrity.
Had this been the reaction to my presence in the past, I might not have been so eager for a change :lol: