- Messages
- 47,627
I like Thurston. His... incident aside, I think he's a nice enough bloke. Far more talented than Johns...
Got to be trolling. Nowhere near the player Johns or even Lockyer were.
And it's *incidents*. Where there's smoke...
I like Thurston. His... incident aside, I think he's a nice enough bloke. Far more talented than Johns...
Got to be trolling. Nowhere near the player Johns or even Lockyer were.
And it's *incidents*. Where there's smoke...
I don't get the Thurston hate. Apart from the Coffs cloud he seems like a good guy & the merkin can play.
I don't get the Thurston hate. Apart from the Coffs cloud he seems like a good guy & the merkin can play.
This is the first time I've ever heard something argue that Johns was anything less than 'a great'.
I'm not even kidding. I've heard people argue guys like Lewis (ha!) or Lockyer were better, but I've never heard him not called a great.
I think you need to go back and re-watch Joey in his hey day if you think he was only good. The guy did all Thurston does in attack + 20 times his defensive work.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Example, Soward. I hated the p*ick, even when he played for the Dragons. However, other people liked/loved him and often regarded him his favorite player.
:lol:
Go quote my post ;-)
He was a great. A shit human, but a great on the field.
I don't get the Thurston hate. Apart from the Coffs cloud he seems like a good guy & the merkin can play.
Thorson, even when he plays poorly, he's still the ultimate competitor.
:lol:
Go quote my post ;-)
He was a great. A shit human, but a great on the field.
Cowboys bandwagon for me.