ouwet
Bench
- Messages
- 3,889
Dragon said:youre telling me theres no 10 minute sin bin anymore? :shock:
Not for high shots buddy.
Dragon said:youre telling me theres no 10 minute sin bin anymore? :shock:
Dragon said:Its gonna cost someone a semi or GF, then we might see the league community actually stand together and say enough is enough. The knights didnt get a penalty till the 53rd minute against the Warriors tonight. Sounds familiar to when we played the warriors. Same ref btw. Its becoming clear who the NRL wants in the 8, and its f**king disgraceful.
fatshark said:I must say that Hazems try was not a try, but how did that touchy miss that knock on from the Stain player.
humpy said:I actually thought Hazem did keep enough control (and I HATE the dogs), but thought the centre pushed Soward in the back into the winger which should have been a penalty.
Enoughsaid said:great hit by ryles on morrin
but the second effort idiot ryles drove his forearm into his head
watch the replay and u will see it
Well Soward can't evaporate into thin air. I think you'll find Soward was not under video scrutiny for pushing his back into Millard's hand.jimmythehand said:but it should have been a penalty to the dogs because soward was an obstruction, not a blocker. So the Dragons can't get a penalty from that...
humpy said:The knights got lapped by 40, and the ref had nothing to do with it.
Dr Crane said:Some Dragons fans think getting done by 30 is the referees fault.
Willow said:Well Soward can't evaporate into thin air. I think you'll find Soward was not under video scrutiny for pushing his back into Millard's hand.
jimmythehand said:the calls that went against the dragons were 50/50 at worst, and it's the attacking team that gets the benefit of the doubt so the calls were right. I actually would have given both tries without benefit of the doubt because I couldn't see anything that should have stopped them. It looked to me like SBW had the ball before Morrin got there, and it looked to me like Hazem caught the ball again before grounding it (he even came up off the ground with the ball still wedged between his arm and body). There was some doubt to both but the way I saw it both looked sweet.
BTW I don't think the attacking team is the team with the ball, it's the team who's in the opponents half. If dragons had the ball from the same scrum and passed it into the ref it's a dogs scrum feed isn't it?
jimmythehand said:BZZZZZ. Wrong again dragon. The attacking team is the one in the opponents territory.
He had every right to be there.jimmythehand said:the point is soward shouldn't have been there.
The video ref and the referee weren't looking for an obstruction.jimmythehand said:he didn't get in position early enough to be a blocker, so his run was illegal because it was an obstruction.
I haven't suggested anything of the sort jimmy.jimmythehand said:To suggest the Dragons should have got a penalty for him being pushed in the back is ridiculous unless you're not up to speed with the latest "interpretations".
_Johnsy said:I am not sure if it is stupdity or ignorance, you are an idiot if you truly believe this.
Willow said:He had every right to be there.The video ref and the referee weren't looking for an obstruction.I haven't suggested anything of the sort jimmy.
You were the one suggesting that Saints should have been penalised.
Perhaps you should read back on what I said with your blinkers removed.
_Johnsy said:I am not sure if it is stupdity or ignorance, you are an idiot if you truly believe this.
I know you'd like all defenders to get out of the way but its not that straight forward. Again, the video ref and the referee were not looking for an obstruction... please try and follow the logic.jimmythehand said:Why does he have every right to be there when it has been clearly stipulated that blockers are only legal if they are in position early?
In post # 72 you were replying to me, correct?jimmythehand said:I didn't say you suggested it.
Oh OK, so when you said the word "you're" in replying to me, you were in fact replying to other posters.jimmythehand said:Other posters suggested it and that's why I brought the point up.