Brian potter
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,308
definitely post origin as anything whilst that’s going on would get swamped.Maybe a post origin announcement
definitely post origin as anything whilst that’s going on would get swamped.Maybe a post origin announcement
Not sure manly would or need to include the central coast these days what with the redevelopment going on at brookvale.Brookvale needs redevelopment to 20k and rebranding to include central coast ( northern Eagles) playing a few games on the central coast, that will constraint supply and push attendance.
Dragons needs to increase the stands on the southern end and corners to bring it over 20k at Wollongong playing all non Sydney clubs there with the Sydney games at alliance.
Rabbits to Alliance.
Accor needs Double headers..
Sharks to Perth lol
You were talking about attendance.now you’re talking about revenue, make up your mind!There's no way a Perth-based team will earn as much revenue from football operations as the Cowboys.
Invite everyone to bid except Perth.To keep the hype going and game in the headlines both in the old media and new the NRL should announce a date for all potential franchises to submit their bids.
Perth has no chance of drawing similar crowds to the Cowboys. In the Cowboys' debut season they drew an average of 21,670 to their games. That's more than Perth Rectangular Stadium can hold.You were talking about attendance.now you’re talking about revenue, make up your mind!
And in 2002 they drew 12k. Perth don’t need to draw the same crowds as cowboys lol.Perth has no chance of drawing similar crowds to the Cowboys. In the Cowboys' debut season they drew an average of 21,670 to their games. That's more than Perth Rectangular Stadium can hold.
Rugby League Tables / Attendances /North Queensland
Rugby League Tables - NRL Stats & Tablesafltables.com
Cowboys were anchored at the bottom of the ladder in 2002.And in 2002 they drew 12k. Perth don’t need to draw the same crowds as cowboys lol.
It'll depend on form. If the team sucks like the Force then don't be surprised if there's less than 10k fans turning up to their games.Would be interesting to find out what sort of crowds a Perth team would attract 30 years later.
So basically like I said, most clubs will draw 12-14k when sht and 17k-20k when good.Cowboys were anchored at the bottom of the ladder in 2002.
Between 1995-2002 they finished 20th (wooden spoon), 17th, 10th (wooden spoon), 16th, 16th, 14th (wooden spoon), 13th and 11th.
If a Perth-based team has a run like that over its first eight seasons then its attendances will be lucky to hit 10k.
Some clubs draw less.So basically like I said, most clubs will draw 12-14k when sht and 17k-20k when good.
No reason at all Perth wont be exactly the same.
That was 30 years ago lol, times have moved on, so should you.Some clubs draw less.
Western Reds were one of them.
A Perth-based team will rely on strong attendances to generate the revenue it needs to compete in a hostile market.
Canberra draw well when playing poorly over the last 10 years?That was 30 years ago lol, times have moved on, so should you.
Any new club coming in needs to be aiming for 20k members, 15-17k crowds and around $8-10mill in sponsors and corporate sales. Nail that and they will be just fine.
The evidence shows that most clubs will draw 12-14k when at bottom of table and 16-20k when at top. Theres a few outliers like Newcastle & Brisbane who draw well regardless and Sharks and Canberra who draw poorly even at top (stadium a big factor). But on the whole that is what the stats show.
eg in last ten years
penrith 11.5k - 18.8k
NQ 13.6k-19.1k
Melbourne 13.4k-19k
Parra 11.1k-20k
Souths 10.9k - 20k
warriors 11.7k - 21k
Thats not what I said, I said Canberra dont draw big crowds, even when winning. They are an outlier.Canberra draw well when playing poorly over the last 10 years?
In 2014 and 2015 9,608 and 9,269. In the decade prior to that their attendances hovered between 10,190 and 13,419.
You said Perth lost 60% of its playerbase over the last 30 years.
Now you're saying it has doubled the size of its active RL supporter base?
Personally I think they game is only really just getting to an acceptable level, and one we should have been at years ago.Anyhow sustaining and building in the current boom will require very careful processes around expansion, investment, and building pathways through the South Pacific.
Expansion has been discussed to death here. Most of us see Perth and NZ2 as best next options. PNG is generally considered to be overly ambitious but there are numerous other options. It’s a great problem to have.
The NRL appears to get making sound investment decisions and we can expect a lot more.
I see the NRL trying to stamp its authority across the South Pacific in order to create player pathways with a lot of emphasis on NZ.
And as I stated earlier, it’s clear the NRL sees participation in a different light with a focus on non contact versions of the game being included in club footy. As an example in the Cronulla district a club called Kurnell has tripled its team numbers by offering Tag in every age group.
Now I’ve got that off my chest, over to you PR and donkey to continue derailing the thread.
Can’t argue with that. 12 years ago when I was involved with the ARL I was shocked at how small minded many of the admin were. It was all about patch protection and nothing about growing revenues crowds or expansion. The game is resilient thank feck because it’s been let down time and time again by it’s management.Personally I think they game is only really just getting to an acceptable level, and one we should have been at years ago.
To call it a boom, probably shows how badly we have underperformed.