What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Team 20 - Who? Adelaide or Queensland 5?

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,215
Looking back and forward, it's all pretty obvious what the NRL want.

17 was always Redcliffe
18 PNG
19 Perth
20 NZ SI
21 Ipswich

After that who knows, but Adelaide, Melbourne 2, Fiji and Wellington will probably put their hand up.
I would venture to say that Adelaide AND Wellington both have strong cases - one means we have a team in NZ's 3 biggest cities and the other means we have all the Australian cities that have at least 1 million population.
 

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,215
Time to talk about it again.

Will it be a Newtown Jets and Port Augusta joint venture?
Pasifika team playing out of Dubbo?
Queensland 5 based in Lismore?
New Zealand 2 out of Auckland?
Singapore Slingers?
Hull Jerks?
Mosman team to cover the central coast?
Robot team?
If competition size & depth is a concern, moving the Tigers to Wellington would help rationalize Sydney, make for a 3rd NZ team (Assuming one of he Christchurch bids is in), and put less pressure on the talent pool.
 

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,215
I can't see a team ever moving from Sydney's unless they choose to.
Yeah, I was probably more putting it out there as a "what if" scenario more then a "this should happen".

There's no willingness for clubs or the NRL to consider relocation, and with the grant pretty much taking care of all then there's no financial pressure to - unless some massive "black swan event" puts one club on a very unsteady footing.
 

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,215
It’s not.
It's obviously not a concern with the NRL's CURRENT push towards 20 teams.

However with Perth, PNG & NZ 2 looking like they're those next 3.. then Adelaide, NZ 3, Brisbane 3, Fiji, Melbourne 2, and where-ever else will need to jostle for teams 21 & 22 (or teams 21-24).

I haven't seen any indication from the NRL they want to do this, and even if they do then there may well be NRL fans & media personalities coming up with the "but.. we have truly terrible teams at the bottom of the table AS IT IS" argument against going past 20 teams once we're at 20 teams.
 

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,495
It's obviously not a concern with the NRL's CURRENT push towards 20 teams.

However with Perth, PNG & NZ 2 looking like they're those next 3.. then Adelaide, NZ 3, Brisbane 3, Fiji, Melbourne 2, and where-ever else will need to jostle for teams 21 & 22 (or teams 21-24).

I haven't seen any indication from the NRL they want to do this, and even if they do then there may well be NRL fans & media personalities coming up with the "but.. we have truly terrible teams at the bottom of the table AS IT IS" argument against going past 20 teams once we're at 20 teams.
And those people will be talking out of their arses.
 

T to the T

Juniors
Messages
503
If competition size & depth is a concern, moving the Tigers to Wellington would help rationalize Sydney, make for a 3rd NZ team (Assuming one of he Christchurch bids is in), and put less pressure on the talent pool.
9bgcjp.jpg
 
Top