What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Team List Tuesday - Rnd 1 NRL team vs Titans

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
63,238
So 7 /16 sides have a back or half on the bench. Surely its better then a guy like Jack Granville on your bench
 
Messages
4,309
Unsure about Shrub on the bench but from what I’ve heard about training is that him, Stoney and Maka have really put their hands up this pre season. Nrown named in reserves so obviously needs a run and come in next week.
 
Last edited:

Incorrect

Coach
Messages
12,865
Manly have a winger on the bench.
Roosters and Brisbane both have a halfback
Dogs have Baili Bindi a halfback
Storm have Nikorima. Is he a halfback?
Saints have Mbye also a half or centre.
My issue with Jarthur being in the 17 is that he wasn't up to scratch in first grade in his preferred position in the halves. How will he cover other backline positions capably?

Anyways, the coach is backing him in and from all reports he has been great in the off season so here's hoping he nails it wherever he gets his opportunity. He might yet be a revelation
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,073
JA covers for 1-7. If Guth went down which is worse case Blake goes to wing, Brown to centre and Russel to back.

If a centre went down D.Brown shift.
If a winger goes down Blake and Brown shift.

Straight swap for hooker.

Plus who knows maybe they've tried D.Brown at hooker for 15mins to rest Mahoney.
All true but is JA in our best 17 available this week? I'm unconvinced.

Maybe he really is the perfect backup?!?
 

Happy MEel

First Grade
Messages
9,867
All true but is JA in our best 17 available this week? I'm unconvinced.

Maybe he really is the perfect backup?!?
Agreed Pou, I don’t get the bench selections. If we’re carrying Stone, we could essentially cover lock, edge forward (with Matto moving to the edge), hooker if needed and we can always reshuffle the backs. Alternatively, if JA is on the bench we can cover the backs and reshuffle the forwards. I don’t understand the rationale behind carrying both as they don’t provide enough in their preferred positions compared to others that aren’t in the 17.
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
63,238
All true but is JA in our best 17 available this week? I'm unconvinced.

Maybe he really is the perfect backup?!?

Either do I. But it does put a few questions in D.Browns head doesn't it. Time for him to step up.
He barely set up a try last year. His attack was nothing but hot garbage. Yes his defemse was great but he can do that at centre. Coach has put him on notice. We may have a better option so time to step up your game.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,073
I think Stone is a legit contributor in defence. I've also seen him do some cool stuff in attack, but that 17 is already stacked with middle forwards who can carry the ball.
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
63,238
Agreed Pou, I don’t get the bench selections. If we’re carrying Stone, we could essentially cover lock, edge forward (with Matto moving to the edge), hooker if needed and we can always reshuffle the backs. Alternatively, if JA is on the bench we can cover the backs and reshuffle the forwards. I don’t understand the rationale behind carrying both as they don’t provide enough in their preferred positions compared to others that aren’t in the 17.


Matterson at lock and no N.Brown means a guy capable of playing 80mins not 55mins.
Papa and Lane can do same. It is rnd one and we get two forwards back next week. That means Jnr and RCG can also play big mins if needed.
 
Messages
4,309
Either do I. But it does put a few questions in D.Browns head doesn't it. Time for him to step up.
He barely set up a try last year. His attack was nothing but hot garbage. Yes his defemse was great but he can do that at centre. Coach has put him on notice. We may have a better option so time to step up your game.
Interesting point Hindy, maybe the JA selection is as much to do with bringing the best out of Drown as it is bringing the best out of Jake.
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
154,355
Agreed Pou, I don’t get the bench selections. If we’re carrying Stone, we could essentially cover lock, edge forward (with Matto moving to the edge), hooker if needed and we can always reshuffle the backs. Alternatively, if JA is on the bench we can cover the backs and reshuffle the forwards. I don’t understand the rationale behind carrying both as they don’t provide enough in their preferred positions compared to others that aren’t in the 17.
Stone and JA don’t make any sense at all IMO, I get one or the other but not them both on the same bench. So Mahoney plays 80mins again or we have to suffer Stone at dummy half which has never ever worked.

Oh well looks like the Arthur make a wish foundation continues to roll on into 2022……….
 

Latest posts

Top