What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Thank the lord...

andrew057

First Grade
Messages
7,485
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...2_a3&eref=sihp

NEW YORK (AP) -- NBA owners and players reached a tentative agreement early Saturday to end the 149-day lockout and hope to begin the delayed season on Christmas Day.

Neither side provided many specifics, but said the only words players and fans wanted to hear.

"We want to play basketball," Commissioner David Stern said.

After a secret meeting earlier this week, the sides met for more than 15 hours Friday, working to try to save the season. This handshake deal, however, still must be ratified by both owners and players.

Stern said it was "subject to a variety of approvals and very complex machinations, but we're optimistic that will all come to pass and that the NBA season will begin Dec. 25."

Barring a change in scheduling, the 2011-12 season will open with the Boston Celtics at New York Knicks, followed by Miami at Dallas in an NBA finals rematch before MVP Derrick Rose and Chicago close the tripleheader against Kobe Bryant and the Lakers.

The league plans a 66-game season and aims to open training camps Dec. 9.

Just 12 days after talks broke down and Stern declared the NBA could be headed to a "nuclear winter," he sat next to union executive director Billy Hunter to announce the deal.

"We thought it was in both of our best interests to try to reach a resolution and save the game," Hunter said.

A majority on each side is needed to approve the agreement. The NBA needs votes from 15 of 29 owners. (The league owns the New Orleans Hornets.)

Stern said the labor committee plans to discuss the agreement later Saturday and expects them to endorse it and recommend to the full board.

The union needs a simple majority of its 430-plus members. That process is a bit more complicated after the players dissolved the union Nov. 14. Now, they must drop their antitrust lawsuit in Minnesota and reform the union before voting on the deal.

Because the union disbanded, a new collective bargaining agreement can only be completed once the union has reformed. Drug testing and other issues still must be negotiated between the league and the players.

"We're very pleased we've come this far," Stern said. "There's still a lot of work to be done."

The settlement first was reported by CBSSports.com.

Participating in the talks for the league were Stern, deputy commissioner Adam Silver, Spurs owner Peter Holt, the chairman of the labor relations committee, and attorneys Rick Buchanan and Dan Rube. The players were represented by executive director Billy Hunter, president Derek Fisher, vice president Maurice Evans, attorney Ron Klempner and economist Kevin Murphy.

"This was not an easy agreement for anyone. The owners came in having
suffered substantial losses and feeling the system wasn't working fairly across all teams," Silver said. "I certainly know the players had strong views about expectations in terms of what they should be getting from the system. It required a lot of compromise from both parties' part, and I think that's what we saw today."

Copyright 2011 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
 

Big Mick

Referee
Messages
26,318
What a shock.

That f**kwit Kessler leaves the room and within a week they have an agreement.

I'm so shocked...oh wait no I'm not, the same freaking thing happened in the NFL talks.

The sooner these labor guys realise that guy is a cancer...the better.
 

Cartman

Juniors
Messages
422
Great news that we will have a season. What tv coverage will we have here though with OneHD dropping the NBA? Will it just be ESPN?
 

Fast Eddie

First Grade
Messages
8,085
Just having ESPN coverage sucks as well, we have that over here and you get 2 games a week. Have to stream all my teams games.
 

Ridders

Coach
Messages
10,831
It's going to be interesting to see all the details of the new deal and how it affects the current NBA landscape.
 

Ridders

Coach
Messages
10,831

Nth-Qld-Raider

Juniors
Messages
710
OneHD is just a complete joke of a channel, so much for free live sport, first they fk up the nbl with delayed crap, so if they don't have nba that will suck, ESPN's coverage is pretty ordinary here in OZ, they got ESPN2 last year and they just replayed games from ESPN, why not show more games between the two channels.

Yeah its about time we got the NBA back, its going to be nice over the next few weeks to have interest in the actual NBA ( free agency ) instead of the fkn lockout BS.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,724
The players actually managed to get a little bit out of the owners.

If the players just accepted 50% in the first place and the owners were a little more reasonable we could have had this exact same deal done months ago.
 

Ridders

Coach
Messages
10,831

So 6 year contracts are now gone, with 5 being the new max (for Bird right players).

The amnesty clause issue, from the article, is interesting;

Each team permitted to waive 1 player prior to any season of the CBA(only for contracts in place at the inception of the CBA) and have 100% ofthe player’s salary removed from team salary for Cap and Tax purposes.

So that means that they can use that one amnesty at any time (obviously before the season has started) during the new CBA?
 
Messages
33,280
Lol @ David Stern. He talked all the big talk and issued all of these threats and continually backed down.

I guess the only coverage we'll get is the usual Miami/Lakers ESPN bullshit. 2 games a week and the same 4 teams, it'll be great :roll:
 

Ridders

Coach
Messages
10,831
Wonder how many teams will use the amnesty clause now and how many will save it up for later?
 

Special K

Coach
Messages
19,561
It will be interesting to see who is cut given they will have to get paid anyway(and so will their replacement).

I hope Philly waives Brand...
 

Ridders

Coach
Messages
10,831
Poor Clippers. They gave away what turned out to be the overall No.1 pick to get rid of Davis's contract, and now the Cavs can just amnesty his ass :lol:. They'd obviously still have to pay him though. Given that the Cavs are under the luxury tax line, I wonder if they would actually amnesty him?

I could see a team like OKC saving their amnesty clause they don't really have any bad contracts that stand out.
 

Ridders

Coach
Messages
10,831

Also in regards to the amnesty clause;

A modified waiver process will be utilized for players waived pursuant tothe Amnesty rule, under which teams with Room under the Cap can submit competing offers to assume some but not all of the player’s remaining contract. If a player’s contract is claimed in this manner, the remaining portion of the player’s salary will continue to be paid by the team that waived him.

So in essence, teams that are under the cap can bid for amnestied players in terms of what proportion of their salary that they're willing contribute to, where I'm assuming the winner is the one with the highest proposed contribution?

So theoretically if the Cavs waived Baron Davis, and the Kings (just a team of the top of my head) proposed to contribute to 40% of his salary, the Cavs would end up only having to pay 60% of it? That seems to make waiving players with this amnesty clause more attractive.
 

ceagle

Bench
Messages
4,853
Lol @ David Stern. He talked all the big talk and issued all of these threats and continually backed down.

I guess the only coverage we'll get is the usual Miami/Lakers ESPN bullshit. 2 games a week and the same 4 teams, it'll be great :roll:
invest in a NBA League Pass
 

attamarrap

Juniors
Messages
2,438
It
Also in regards to the amnesty clause;



So in essence, teams that are under the cap can bid for amnestied players in terms of what proportion of their salary that they're willing contribute to, where I'm assuming the winner is the one with the highest proposed contribution?

So theoretically if the Cavs waived Baron Davis, and the Kings (just a team of the top of my head) proposed to contribute to 40% of his salary, the Cavs would end up only having to pay 60% of it? That seems to make waiving players with this amnesty clause more attractive.
It also stops teams like miami and la being able to just pay peanuts for amnesty players because teams with more cap space can out bid them
 

Latest posts

Top