Here's a clue... you are a child.Macca616 said:mickdo - whats doing with the acne cream call - thats just ordinary. get some new stuff.
How about you go and look up the words 'not based on the australian legal system' and come back when you're done.Macca616 said:Mickdo - go and look up the terms diminished responsibility together with lay evidence as to character, watch the news to see a penalty of two weeks and lets see who needs to back to school.
Obviously it was profound enough for you to google it...Macca616 said:BTW, nothing you say in Latin is profound
You're only problem there pal is that the NRL judiciary is not a criminal law courtMacca616 said:HEY THERE MICKDO! YOUR NOT GOING REAL WELL ARE YOU MATE.
Abnormality of mind
Criminal law
An element of the defence of diminished responsibility in New South Wales and Queensland. An abnormality of mind is a state of mind so different from that of ordinary human beings that a reasonable person would term it abnormal: R v Purdy [1982] 2 NSWLR 964 ; (1982) 7 A Crim R 122 . It is wide enough to cover the mind's activities in all its aspects, not only the perception of physical acts and matters, and the ability to form a rational judgment as to whether an act is right or wrong, but also the ability to exercise will-power to control physical acts in accordance with that rational judgment: R v Purdy.
16 posts of utter shyte. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.Macca616 said:Christ this is like pulling teeth. You idiot - hearsay goes to the content of what he said which if you have bothered to follow this is the key issue. A lot will turn on whether the language was directed at cecchin or at the situation itself. Hearsay is relevant because it allows witnesses close to the event to give evidence. Are you following yet?
That definition is from a subscribed service Mickdo - so stop biting, run home and enjoy your own miserable company