lol. nopeBut in reality, it get most decisions correct and it is making those decisions a lot quicker than before.
lol. nope
Given the technology they're getting way too many wrong. In fact about the same level of ineptitude that the old video ref system displayed.
And how exactly are they making decisions a lot quicker than before? The ref blows time off and sends it upstairs while they look at it from 20 different angles, over and over.
The Radley no try for example, I could see within 30 seconds of replays that Mitchell got hands to the ball and it was a knock on. But they continued to play it back and forwards for another minute. From all different angles.
How exactly is it quicker?
He did regain it. It was never out of either hand.
I don’t see what the fuss is about.
He did regain it. It was never out of either hand.
I don’t see what the fuss is about.
Lol. Ok. Then we can just get of refs and use the honesty system.the best indicator of a try being scored is the actual player.
he said himself after the match that it was a try.
When we're watching the replays the comments from the fools in the bunker match exactly what we're seeing. I believe that what we see and what they see are the same thing.The replay footage you see on TV isn't what the bunker is looking at.
We'll just have to disagree on this.In general the bunker is much quicker.
When we're watching the replays the comments from the fools in the bunker match exactly what we're seeing. I believe that what we see and what they see are the same thing.
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/inside-the-nrls-video-referee-bunker-20150602-ghf4gj.htmlYou would be wrong then.
"What you see at home is essentially what the video referee sees at the moment," said Stuart Taggart, a consultant to the NRL on the feasibility of the central command centre.
Ah. Right.That's from 3 years ago.