Gobsmacked
Bench
- Messages
- 3,126
I think it's hard to define " crack" the US market. I would consider that we have cracked the market..if we have one in the USA:Rugby league was also invented after all those sports and derived from union, in fact it was the same as rugby union at first because the 'schism' between the two sports was about class, not the rules or anything like that which you well know. So let's not pretend rugby league was randomly introduced to NSW and QLD without having an already established base and platform from union
Do you have a link for the bolded?
RE: Toronto, define wildly successful? I would actually agree with you but I have a feeling my baseline is lower than yours as rugby league is a drop in the ocean in the Canadian market.
Soccer in the USA is probably the best case study for what we are talking about. The biggest sport in the world in the biggest market in the world and it pails in to insignificance compared to NFL, MLB, NBA and to a lesser extent NHL. It's not as if soccer has no history there either yet it is a 2nd tier sport and always will be much like Soccer in Australia.
I wish the NRL the best of luck in this venture and hope they make some money and they have smashed the promotional stuff out of the park IMO. If they can entice some American players over, get a small TV deal or even establish an amateur competition over there then all power to them. To suggest though that rugby league will crack that market in any meaningful way because it's "the best sport int he world" is the same level of ignorance of the AFL dopes who said the same about AFL in China, NZ or anywhere else they conceived in their delusions.
And that's ok... it's not a crack at rugby league... it's just an observation about the nature of sports popularity globally.
A TV deal no matter how small that brings the game live into the US weekly and an awareness generally..
Viewership over 100k weekly.
That's a piece and noteworthy.
It'll never be fully mainstream but one can dream.