The LJC\Stallion Thread

[Whatwhere]

Lol. You are truelly a freak of nature! I was signed to.play at my local district rugby league club whilst I was at school. Yes it was for the next year. This for whatever reason prompted the union people to make sure I signed a waiver declaration prior to me playing a game of union during my final school year. I have corrected a time line arrow as in 1982 I represented Hunter regional schoolboys


Yes. It's quite reflective of where these union dudes are at Batley. They are so intent on deflecting and subverting a constructive discourse. It's really pathetic but with moderator support and powers they can stop people from replying in a timely manner (this has happened to me a number of times ) .They are a disgraceful lot whom do not have the interest of rugbyleague at heart.

No. You stated on several occasions on this very thread which has been sighted by multiple others that you were being paid to play League during your time at school. You've now altered that story when confronted in order to fit into your narrative.

And now your quoting your multi which is hilarious.

 

[Whatwhere]

Get a life!You seem to be obsessed with the fact that Stallion and I are one of the same.What a complete drongo.

Says the bloke who posted here over New Year's Eve. As in not long after midnight in NZ (if you were actually in NZ). Which suggests that you don't have much of an actual life. I was at a party. With friends.

 

[Stallion]

You said you had to sign a waiver because you were paid to play League. You now say that you were only paid a year later. you lied.

Had you been paid you would not have been permitted to play Rugby in and NSWRU comp, be it schoolboy or club. Once again you lied... maybe I should change the thread title back to what it was.

I corrected the information! It still shows what a domineering ando overbearing organisation is in my opinion. No other sport applied such compliance paperwork!? Union is the type of sport that does stuff like this. Other sports did not do this when I was at school. Their is something dodgy about union and I realise you're doing your bit to deflect and discredit information. And yes you are truelly part of the repression puzzle facing and being suffered by rugby league. So With knowledge I know the types the good guys are up against. And yes you do have the power but do you have fairness and decency?

 

[Stallion]

What was in this alleged waiver?

It was to assure that I had no intention of receiving monies or offers whilst playing rugby union . I dI'd ask about it and that's what was briefly explained to me. It moreso a 'protocol' thing. Tick & flick thing to cover the local union people I think? Still pretty odd when you think about the big scene of things as far as any sport participation is concerned. Especially at school level in my opinion. Just an example of 'big brother' union having their tentacles involved over rugby league participation.

 

[Stallion]

No it’s you that ignores appropriate context. If a kiwi calls union rugby the context is he’s a f**king kiwi.

No idiot! It's appropriate to the media being used. Being respectfully to rugby league onand Australian rugby league website starts a positive discourse. Being dis respectful does not. Resonance the code of rugby league is assumed an inferior standing to union in reference. It matters! YOU go complete a Communications degree and get back to me. Till then you and union loving cohorts are out of line within an Australian rugby league website. Understand the cultural imposter but it's essentially rude and wring on behalf of a totalitarian and bigot like schooling regime that has presided over mostly innocent and compliant people within NZ. They are unaware of the disresoectfullness as a bigoted education system supports and propagates such apathy be it deliberate or innocent.

 

[Stallion]

This is an Australian forum not an American one. It’s f**king maths.

Lol. You finally actually got something right! Now apply the same naming principle for rugby league and rugby union in Australia and we have no issue!? But no that doesn't click for you does it!?

 

[Stallion]

Mate, I think some of us on here (I can only speak for myself though) want to stop blaming external factors for the state of the game. We know it should be greater than it is. But instead of playing the 'victim of union' card, let's look inside and put pressure on our administrators to get the things right that are in our control. Marketing, international calendars, meaningful tournaments, GB in Australia (like you say). If we start getting this things right from the RLIF right down (all on one page), any external influence will have minimal effect. RL, not RU is our worst enemy at the moment and I would like to see that change.

I agree with what you have said! However I get the feeling that people have been appointed within the code for it's constrainment and containment. Perhaps the enemy from within? Basically pandering to keep ugly big brother union the upper hand along with limiting core growth of the rugby league code in the big picture. You will note I have criticized rugbyleague decisions as well. They are both damaging rugby league's progress.

 

[Stallion]

It won't increase the NRL's average attendance though, it won't add significantly to the TV ratings and it won't provide the TV companies with the additional value required to pay for their inclusion. This is why it is a non-starter.

Perth, Brisbane and NZ2 will all pretty much pay for themselves. Central Coast can be covered by an existing Sydney team and if relocation there full-time is viable in the future, then they can take up that option.

That's were we dissagree. The benefits are there for factors like increased tv ratings, greater community interest in a population base of 1.2 million people and more potent rivalries such such as Manly v Bears and Newcastle v Central Coast etc.And the fact the infrastructure *( modern Ground, Rail travel etc )are already place is a bonus!

 

[Stallion]

No. You stated on several occasions on this very thread which has been sighted by multiple others that you were being paid to play League during your time at school. You've now altered that story when confronted in order to fit into your narrative.

And now your quoting your multi which is hilarious.

You are not very 'with it' are you? I have corrected a matter of fact. A decent person does this. A not so decent person ridicules and plays on with it. (tries to gain cheap shots whilst their deflection aim is being continued)You have a purpose of being scurrilous! Not my go.

 

[Whatwhere]

You are not very 'with it' are you? I have corrected a matter of fact. A decent person does this. A not so decent person ridicules and plays on with it. (tries to gain cheap shots whilst their deflection aim is being continued)You have a purpose of being scurrilous! Not my go.

So does a poor liar. They also tend to go on the attack and try to discredit others in defence of their lies. Which lines up with everything you've done here.

 

[Pommy]

No idiot! It's appropriate to the media being used. Being respectfully to rugby league onand Australian rugby league website starts a positive discourse. Being dis respectful does not. Resonance the code of rugby league is assumed an inferior standing to union in reference. It matters! YOU go complete a Communications degree and get back to me. Till then you and union loving cohorts are out of line within an Australian rugby league website. Understand the cultural imposter but it's essentially rude and wring on behalf of a totalitarian and bigot like schooling regime that has presided over mostly innocent and compliant people within NZ. They are unaware of the disresoectfullness as a bigoted education system supports and propagates such apathy be it deliberate or innocent.

Nobody except you thinks it’s rude, you are mentally unhinged.

 

[titoelcolombiano]

That's were we dissagree. The benefits are there for factors like increased tv ratings, greater community interest in a population base of 1.2 million people and more potent rivalries such such as Manly v Bears and Newcastle v Central Coast etc.And the fact the infrastructure *( modern Ground, Rail travel etc )are already place is a bonus!

Increased TV ratings? By how much? Perth add a whole other TV slot, Brisbane 2 gives broadcasters a weekly Brisbane match and NZ2 will probably increase the Sky TV deal in NZ (currently $100m) but admittedly not by double.

The NRL TV ratings will not increase due to Norths' inclusion, nor will the league's average attendance.

 

[Stallion]

So does a poor liar. They also tend to go on the attack and try to discredit others in defence of their lies. Which lines up with everything you've done here.

You are the true liar and complicit with a repression of a football code of rugby league. You are nothing but a scurrilous person .You are supporting a bigoted and essentIally failing code in union that I would suggest has human rights issues to answer when someone with clout decides that enough is enough! Awareness is the big issue ! Many are oblivious to the fact elite private schools allow other football and still no rugby league. Things like that and many more examples are at play. But you sheepishly live your establishment propagated union lie and have the hide to deflect and run interference on a rugby league website. You are a lowlife non tackling scum bucket!

 

[Stallion]

Increased TV ratings? By how much? Perth add a whole other TV slot, Brisbane 2 gives broadcasters a weekly Brisbane match and NZ2 will probably increase the Sky TV deal in NZ (currently $100m) but admittedly not by double.

The NRL TV ratings will not increase due to Norths' inclusion, nor will the league's average attendance.

I am fully supportive of the other areas as well! Have not argued against them at any point? The Bears set up is a regaining and consolidation of a crucial NSW area
God only knows there has been enough damage in the greater Sydney heartland area to date. It's consolidation and a reclamation. That's good business when the infrastructure is already there.

 

[Te Kaha]

I corrected the information! It still shows what a domineering ando overbearing organisation is in my opinion. No other sport applied such compliance paperwork!? Union is the type of sport that does stuff like this. Other sports did not do this when I was at school. Their is something dodgy about union and I realise you're doing your bit to deflect and discredit information. And yes you are truelly part of the repression puzzle facing and being suffered by rugby league. So With knowledge I know the types the good guys are up against. And yes you do have the power but do you have fairness and decency?

You really are geniused. there is no other simple explanation.

You would have only been able to play Rugby IF you had never received money from playing Professional Rugby. Since League was both amateur and professional, a form to state you had never received money from "Professional Rugby" is ENTIRELY appropriate.

You would not have had to sign it from any other sport because they didn't have the "no professional" rule. However you would have had to sign it if you were entering an Olympic sport, since that too was amateur at that time.

I cant believe someone who is a teacher cant understand that.

 

[Whatwhere]

You are the true liar and complicit with a repression of a football code of rugby league. You are not a scurrilous person .You are supporting a bigoted and essentIally failing code in union that I would suggest has human rights issues to answer when someone with clout decides that enough is enough! Awareness is the big issup! Many are oblivious to the fact elite private schools allow other football and still no rugby league. Things like that and many more examples are at play. But you sheepishly live your establishment propagated union lie and have the hide to deflect and run interference on a rugby league website. You are a lowlife non tackling scum bucket!

Attack, attack, attack.

 

[Pommy]

You are the true liar and complicit with a repression of a football code of rugby league. You are not a scurrilous person .You are supporting a bigoted and essentIally failing code in union that I would suggest has human rights issues to answer when someone with clout decides that enough is enough! Awareness is the big issup! Many are oblivious to the fact elite private schools allow other football and still no rugby league. Things like that and many more examples are at play. But you sheepishly live your establishment propagated union lie and have the hide to deflect and run interference on a rugby league website. You are a lowlife non tackling scum bucket!

Unhinged.

 

[Stallion]

You really are geniused. there is no other simple explanation.

You would have only been able to play Rugby IF you had never received money from playing Professional Rugby. Since League was both amateur and professional, a form to state you had never received money from "Professional Rugby" is ENTIRELY appropriate.

You would not have had to sign it from any other sport because they didn't have the "no professional" rule. However you would have had to sign it if you were entering an Olympic sport, since that too was amateur at that time.

I cant believe someone who is a teacher cant understand that.

Why is it appropriate!? I'm just playing another sport!?
Unless you are open to one sport exerting influence over another sport!? And a negative overbearing influence at that!

 

[Pommy]

Why is it appropriate!? I'm just playing another sport!?
Unless you are open to one sport exerting influence over another sport!? And a negative overbearing influence at that!

It’s literally the reason why we have two sports.....

 

[Stallion]

You really are geniused. there is no other simple explanation.

You would have only been able to play Rugby IF you had never received money from playing Professional Rugby. Since League was both amateur and professional, a form to state you had never received money from "Professional Rugby" is ENTIRELY appropriate.

You would not have had to sign it from any other sport because they didn't have the "no professional" rule. However you would have had to sign it if you were entering an Olympic sport, since that too was amateur at that time.

I cant believe someone who is a teacher cant understand that.

Why did union have the "no professional rule "in place. From many sources it was a sham in many countries around the world!? Was it actually "big ugly brother" flexing his overbearing power and influence over a more attractive sibling code?