Young Dragon
Juniors
- Messages
- 23
You guys can’t seriously be pondering klemmer? He is absolutely useless. I think flano has his eyes set a bit higher than that. Only way you could possible even consider it is if it was a one year deal
Probably will come down to tigers paying a lot of his contract flanno won't pay much for himI doubt he is coming but if he was, it would be purely to get rid of Molo and get something in return.
Klemmer ten years ago, sure.
Now? Meh
Hopefully it sorts the Molo thing out
That’s my first take as well. I think the game has passed him by. I’m talking about effectiveness- not stats.You guys can’t seriously be pondering klemmer? He is absolutely useless. I think flano has his eyes set a bit higher than that. Only way you could possible even consider it is if it was a one year deal
Tigers are very willing to do soProbably will come down to tigers paying a lot of his contract flanno won't pay much for him
Not that I'm terribly enthused about it but one year of Klemmer would still be of far greater benefit to our forward pack than one year of Lawrie. And if it helps move Molo on then ok.You guys can’t seriously be pondering klemmer? He is absolutely useless. I think flano has his eyes set a bit higher than that. Only way you could possible even consider it is if it was a one year deal
He would be coming from the club with the worst discipline in the league. We already have Luciano doing two dropped balls and one penalty per game. We do not need more of that. We should be recruiting disciplined players.Probably will come down to tigers paying a lot of his contract flanno won't pay much for him
Wests must be picking up the tab, but do we even have a slot open? It is Sharon Woods 2.0.Klemmer for a year or 2 isn't a bad move, with his experience it's definitely a Flanno type signing. Just seen it's apparently a done deal and immediate, it's from daily tele so won't post because it's behind a paywall
Who knows but it's Flannos decision at the end of the day so I'll back him. Experience is invaluable especially with our young guns coming through. Guess it's not 100% official until the club announcementWests must be picking up the tab, but do we even have a slot open? It is Sharon Woods 2.0.
Is 50% considered a pass mark?Not that I'm terribly enthused about it but one year of Klemmer would still be of far greater benefit to our forward pack than one year of Lawrie. And if it helps move Molo on then ok.
Flanno gives him 4 instructions. 1. catch the ball 2. run hard. 3 make your tackles. 4. don't give away penalties.
I mean Blake hasn't played for Australia or his state and probably never will.. they aren't even remotely similiarKlemmer is a taller version of Blake Lawrie
Makes dumb mistakes
Gives away penalties
Stiffles the attack in the opposition 20
He is one of the players where stats don't tell you the truth
You can't miss a tackle if you don't move latterly
Wests must be picking up the tab, but do we even have a slot open? It is Sharon Woods 2.0.