Copa said:
so they're not pure cos they have the wrong hobbies ie union.?
if the irish didn't care they wouldn't even have a comp... and they wouldn't have got their comp sponsors thats for sure..
So you condone/defend a comp where 31 matches in a season are no-shows?! In my opinion that's a disgrace and an insult to our sport. Do you think that's treating RL with respect? God knows what some of the other matches are like. Maybe 11 v 12 etc etc. And you can still say 'if the Irish didn't care...'. Sounds like there's not much caring going on. 31 matches!!
As for sponsors...aren't they magazines? So the sponsorship might be - I said might as I don't know - simply coverage of RL in the magazines. The other is a sports drink. I know several sports drink sponsors in Dubai and they don't pay cash, they supply drinks. The lebanese sponsorship is money.
And you didn't answer the question: What would you prefer. Five RL clubs in a country or 15 names of clubs with fancy nicknames that play RL in the RU offseason?
What's better long term development for RL, a comp with pure RL players or one where RU players try RL - when they can be arsed it seems, which they couldn't 31 times in a season! - in the offseason?
You seem to have taken a position of defending Ireland and will now do so regardless, despite the obvious weaknesses in the nation's domestic claims. I'd rather Ireland did a small comp with RL clubs for players/officials/coaches/administrators who wanted to concentrate on RL, not RU.