I know alot are saying top 8 minimum next year otherwise Hook gets the bullet. For me, if we fall say 1 game short and can see real progress, with fewer dropped balls, 6 agains, and better defense, and a real sense that the club is progressing then I would be happy to keep him on. If he is still there in 2023 and we don't make semis, then he would have had 3 years and time to give someone else a go.
Interesting scenarios that some (not you T13) have put forward re: Hook
1. Be in the top 8 by round 6
2. Be in the top 8 by round 10
3. Be playing finals football
Applying this logic, only scenario 3 seems to be his only exit. Even this year, we were in the top 8 up until round 20.
We have by far a superior squad next year, compared to this year. Several players would have a full pre-season as will the juniors. The new recruits, and we are still in the market place for at least another 3 players, are of higher quality than we've attempted to recruit in the last 10 years.
ALL teams will improve next year, especially if we can return to some normality with COVID. We just have to improve exponentially faster than them.
There is also the "plan". What is the best 'plan' to see us thrive for next year, 3 years, 5 years. Like changing a manager in a business, each will change the 'plan' to suit themselves, in some cases the 'plan' backfires horribly.
Hook has a Club option for '23, making the 8 should be only 1 of many KPI's that he would have to meet, as there are many variables that could impact our season, and we have seen that this year. Take TTurbo out of Manly, as he was earlier in the season, and they are 'ordinary' at best and do they make the 8 without him.
I'm not an advocate of Hook, nor am I a detractor. He's done some really good things, and he's done some questionable things. It all depends on what the "plan" is moving forward with or without him.