Dodge said:Pulling stats out of years ass may appear cool
Dodge, sentences work better if they make sense. Particularly if you're trying to avoid looking like an utter dumbarse.
Dodge said:Pulling stats out of years ass may appear cool
phonetic said:It's a pretty stupid thread, especially when started by a Tigers fan. They were the bandwagon kings at the end of last year. A few 'wagoners turned out for the first match against St George, and it's tapered since.
They are without doubt well supported, but it's a bit of a laugh seeing a Wests fan have a dig at the Roosters about their fickle supporter base.
Personally I have no problem with bandwagoners anyway, if they are helping the stadium be filled.
What I meant was that the Roosters home crowd averages improved by nearly 50% the year after they won the comp. The Tigers has only just improved.TV Ted Ellery said:Roosters 2003: home crowd aggregate: 193, 201 Home average: 16, 100
Wests Tigers 2006: home crowd aggregate: 175, 011 Home average: 19, 446
(When you add in the Jade stadium game the adjusted figures are aggregate: 18, 968 Home average: 189, 686)
For your assertion to be correct the Tigers would need to draw less than 2000 to each of the two remaining home games.
All the stats are at http://stats.rleague.com/rl/rl_index.html
The Bulldogs stats have been over-estimated. The proper home ground averages are 16.5k for 2005 and 18k for 2004.
That means that the Tigers home ground average for 2006 eclipses their own 2005 mark, which was the highest for a Sydney club since Parramatta in 1986.
innsaneink said:Youre a f**kin goose....its an article in the papaer.
Trevor Cogger said:Yes but you spun it to bag out Easts, even though the Panthers despite winning a more recent GF and being arguably more successful for the past few years have a worse average, but still you wanted to highlight Easts. Do you have an agenda , are you envious or just an ignorant farkwit. Over the past 20 years I dare say Easts have a greater average than your joint venture.
even though the Panthers despite winning a more recent GF and being arguably more successful for the past few years have a worse average, but still you wanted to highlight Easts.
Dodge, the statistics on Rleague are inaccurate because they consider the total double header attendances as Canterbury's home crowds and whatsmore they disregard games that are moved to other venues.Timmah said:Doesn't answer my question farkwit. How depressing, you took the time to change my handle to my old username, funnily enough to do exactly what it implied... dodge the question.
You're f**king fired, Nook ;-)
Timmah said:It's very simple Ted.
Each team is allocated 12 home games out of 24 they play in a season. Some teams move games to neutral venues, but if it is home billed, that game is part of their HOME average.
On home averages (that includes Saints @ Aussie, which is their home game, and Manly @ SCG, which was also theirs), St George are ahead of Manly. And that's not using Rleague's stats.
Immortal said:Wait for Tigers to have 2 bad years in a row to be fair.
But Roosters wavering support doesn't surprise in the least![]()
Dumbf**k Dodge said:Doesn't answer my question farkwit
Dumbf**k Dodge said:dodge the question
Pulling stats out of your ass may appear cool, but unless you back up what you're saying, you're full of sh*t.
Wests are also two popular Sydney teams combined into one.
Chook said:Two Grand Final loses in a row 03-04!
Missing the finals two years in a row 05-06!
Having to watch the abomination of Finch running around in your colours!
Name me one footy club that wouldn't suffer a drop in attendance after that cenario?
We know we're hemeraging, we don't need some dickwad defending pretenders fan telling us that.
But hey Inssane, if it get's your post count up... :roll:
Chook.