Top ten things Rugby owes to league

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

Would you like a tissue?

Or would you like me to keep repeating the same thing over and over.

Either is fine.

 

[Loudstrat]

Wow. This is like leaving the club because they are playing some tedious boring rap song, coming back 6 months later, and the bloody song is still going!!!!!!!

Antibrain, all your questions have been answered days ago.

 

[ANTiLAG]

EA - you do not seem to understand plain english. Don't be embarrassed - if you do not understand a question I will clarify it for you.

Loudstrat - no, they havn't. Do you too need pasting of the questions that have not been answered? Or is it a comprehension issue you are suffering, again? EA is avoiding answering my questions. Which is prerogative but does make him appear to be nothing more than a coward.

EA - before xmas would be lovely. Thanks.

 

[Loudstrat]

Well, you need a re-pasting of the ones that have been, and you are re-asking again.

 

[Squatdog]

This thread is still going?

 

[Phil McGrawhan]

This thread is still going?

Yep, We have one of OZ's greatest legal minds slobbering over it.

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

EA - you do not seem to understand plain english.

I understand it better than you think obviously.

Don't be embarrassed -

There's only one person that should be embarrassed from this thread. I'll give you a hint, if you grab a mirror and gaze into it (try not to crack one), you'll be looking at him.

if you do not understand a question I will clarify it for you.

You've said that a few times now.

Do you think you'll get frequent flyer points for repetitive, stupid sentences?

Loudstrat - no, they havn't. Do you too need pasting of the questions that have not been answered? Or is it a comprehension issue you are suffering, again? EA is avoiding answering my questions. Which is prerogative but does make him appear to be nothing more than a coward.

lol @ coward. Ima f**king sue you for libel you fart-eating, dog-rimming, Volvo-driving, earwig-defiling, fruit-bat frotting, pimms drinking, watercress sandwich eating, lipstick -wearing, one testicled result of the union between horse and slightly geniused goat.
lol @ suing.
Do you know a good lawyer?

The answers are all there but when those answers come with questions regading the way you come up with your theories, you just simply ignore them.

There are more stinky holes in your arguments than the first thirty rows of a Communards concert.

EA - before xmas would be lovely. Thanks.

Feel free to keep ignoring the answers already given.

There's a good boy.

Santa Claus is coming to town.... you had better f**k off before he gets here, he hates sooks.

 

[ANTiLAG]

EA - have another look. Many many questions are ignored and unanswered. Others you have answered with either an insult or a question. That is still not an answer. Do you really want me to paste the unanswered questions and make you out to be a liar or a bigger fool?

You want to display holes in my argument, then do it. But a mere assertion and an insult doesn't cut it. Try the words; because, hence, thus, ergo, therefore and consequently'. They'll help you.

Re Libel - ".... appear to be a coward" - nothing defamatory there at all. 1 You have not been indentified by name directly nor sufficently indirectly 2 The use of the word 'appear' takes out the direct nexus of the word to your person. 3 A resonable person is unlikely to find the comment libelous given context. This thread has become nothing more than an anonymous flame fest and you've been no saint. 4 I have qualified privilege to make the statement due to your attacking comments. 5 Truth is always a complete defence to defamation actions (libel or slander).

Now f*ck off with your talkback legal knowlege and answer the questions

 

[Loudstrat]

I'll answer them.

1) No. Cronin kicked more goals per game than Ridge.
2) Yes. Ricky Stuart - the best general play kicker of both codes at the times, stated in a RLW article about how he had to change his kicking style due to the new synthetic balls.
3) No. The bloke who healed the sick, cured the blind and died on the cross to save the world was not Daryl Halligan.
4) Jack Gibson knew about good kickers, having coached Cronin, John Peard, John Brass and Greame Langlands
5) There are as many round the corner kickers taking shots from beyond 35m as there are premiership rings in Ben Kusto's top drawer.

Happy?

 

[Loudstrat]

Wow! Silence from Antibrain!

Could this thread be finally............


dead?

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

EA - have another look.

No.

Many many questions are ignored and unanswered.

No, they're answered.

Others you have answered with either an insult or a question. That is still not an answer. Do you really want me to paste the unanswered questions and make you out to be a liar or a bigger fool?

You do whatever you want champ.

How's that been working out for you so far? :lol:

You know all that will happen is you'll end up more of a quivering mess than you are now.

You want to display holes in my argument, then do it.

They're already displayed.

But a mere assertion and an insult doesn't cut it.

Sometimes, it just simply does. ;-)

Try the words; because, hence, thus, ergo, therefore and consequently'. They'll help you.

They'll help me what?

Re Libel - ".... appear to be a coward" - nothing defamatory there at all.

There is something so wrong with you.

1 You have not been indentified by name directly nor sufficently indirectly 2 The use of the word 'appear' takes out the direct nexus of the word to your person. 3 A resonable person is unlikely to find the comment libelous given context. This thread has become nothing more than an anonymous flame fest and you've been no saint. 4 I have qualified privilege to make the statement due to your attacking comments. 5 Truth is always a complete defence to defamation actions (libel or slander).

The fact that I called libel then called you everything under the sun didn't give you a hint that I already knew that?

You're more f**ked in the head than I thought.

I reckon, and I'm going out on a limb here, that you're sans female company on a permanent basis. I'm also pretty sure that you don't require it because at some point in your life, you had your testicles removed voluntarily.

There you go, I used the word because.

Now f*ck off with your talkback legal knowlege and answer the questions

You're so, so bad at this.

Talkback legal knowledge. lmao

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

Wow! Silence from Antibrain!

Could this thread be finally............


dead?

Nah, he'll be back, his ego won't allow him to stop.

He's probably off banging what's left of his dick in the door with someone called Roger.

 

[ANTiLAG]

You two really are just another couple of bricks in the wall, with less intelligent conversation than the other bricks.

 

[ANTiLAG]

I'll answer them.

1) No. Cronin kicked more goals per game than Ridge.

At what percentage kicking accuracy? Do you actually fail to see the fallacy of your stat? Try an anlogy - Lockyer may make more tackles per game than Hayne or Dugan - does that make Lockyer a better tackler? Need to know the misses too, they are essential is assessing ones ability.

2) Yes. Ricky Stuart - the best general play kicker of both codes at the times, stated in a RLW article about how he had to change his kicking style due to the new synthetic balls.

Was Ricky a noted goal kicker of any sort? Did he not play more seasons than place kicks goals actually kicked? 7 landed goals makes him an expert on goal kicking. I think no.

3) No. The bloke who healed the sick, cured the blind and died on the cross to save the world was not Daryl Halligan.

And....

4) Jack Gibson knew about good kickers, having coached Cronin, John Peard, John Brass and Greame Langlands

....

5) There are as many round the corner kickers taking shots from beyond 35m as there are premiership rings in Ben Kusto's top drawer.

Clearly you are referring to league here and not union. However I can show you video of little Jamie Soward knocking them over from 40 with no difficulty.

Happy?

You have totalyl missed the point. Is it deliberate or are you that dumb. Go back a page - mostly in bold you will see a list of questions I asked with EA's feeble half assed attempts to answer. Answer those questions.

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

You two really are just another couple of bricks in the wall, with less intelligent conversation than the other bricks.

That's your first attempt at humour?

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

Was Ricky a noted goal kicker of any sort? Did he not play more seasons than place kicks goals actually kicked? 7 landed goals makes him an expert on goal kicking. I think no.

That is particularly funny. You're only funny when you don't want to be.

Ricky Stuart isn't a expert on goalkicking because he only landed 7 goals in NSWRL/NRL first grade?

But you are an expert. :lol:

The obvious question is;

How many goals did you kick in first grade NRL/NSWRL ?

 

[ANTiLAG]

But then of course, that applies equally to you EA.

My point about Ricky is, EA, if it needed clarification is that Ricky's comments are relevant to drop punting and spiral kicking the ball, not kicking for goal. Ricky was not talking about goal kicking. You, on the other hand have attacked Darryl Halligan's opinion about Jason Taylor and his goal kicking. Are you more of an expert than Darryl Halligan? Goes both ways, sunshine.

Now instead of busting into a conversation with another, how about you answer the questions aimed directly to you?

 

[manoj p]

The lawyer spelt anti league wrong...

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

But then of course, that applies equally to you EA.

No. I don't think anyone with a better than single digit IQ would consider that my posts are that of someone claiming to be an expert on goalkicking.

Yours on the other hand..

So, how many did you kick?

Stop avoiding the questions put to you. The answer for this one is a simple one that shouldn't tax your memory for any more than a split second.

If the answer is less than 7, then all you need to do is shhhhhhh.

My point about Ricky is, EA, if it needed clarification is that Ricky's comments are relevant to drop punting and spiral kicking the ball, not kicking for goal.

Ricky's opinion was on kicking. Goalkicking is kicking. If it altered how he had to kick in general play, commonsense would tell you that it would affect all facets of kicking, including goalkicking. You like to chase stats, feel free to find the stats of goalkickers before and after the change from leather to synthetic to prove Loudstat's post wrong.

You, on the other hand have attacked Darryl Halligan's opinion about Jason Taylor and his goal kicking. Are you more of an expert than Darryl Halligan? Goes both ways, sunshine.

Mine was an opinion and I was 1/2 agreeing with Halligan. He was just a kicker.

That was an attack? LOL

Now instead of busting into a conversation with another, how about you answer the questions aimed directly to you?

They say ignorance is bliss.

You don't seem blissful though.

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

The lawyer spelt anti league wrong...

lol

Good call.