It's a fact that 'rugby' (union) owes League the Rugby World Cup as well. It should have been the header of point eight.
We want reberations!
We're obviously referring to the Rugby World Cup. It instigated by the French Rugby League (Rugby XIII) in 1954.Union don't owe us anything in regards to the World Cup. League didn't come up with the concept
NINE: France
That's right, France was once a predominantly league territory that was downright stolen by the 15-man game.
For the most part the French wanted no truck with British amateur ideals, instead embracing the professional code wholeheartedly.
Then came the Nazis. Not the RFU. The real Nazis. After the defeat of France in 1940, the French Rugby Union worked with the German-collaborating Vichy regime to re-establish the dominance of their sport.
Union's amateur ethos appealed to the Nazis' view of sport purity. League was banned and all assets of the Rugby League and its clubs were handed over to the union.They were never returned.
Don't forget Touch Footy that they are rapidly stealing by promoting Touch Rugby - worldwide I think.
Anyone care to explain what he means about the Roosters there ? He must be referring to the Roosters vs Warriors game this year i assume. We must have won a few against the feed or something. It was a great game, with Hoahia (sp?) not even caring about his own self-preservation by smashing into the goalposts to win the match for the Warriors in the final seconds.
Have heard about this, but geez it's not a great look for Union there.
Have heard about this, but geez it's not a great look for Union there.
RU stole France but eventually we'll steal all the pacific, USA and eastern bloc European nations. Give it time.
Anyone care to explain what he means about the Roosters there ?
What about reversing it...
Top 10 things league owes to rugby
1, Platform to 'invent' a new code called Northern Union (now RL)
2, Importance of goal kicking - Although there have been some good goal kickers throughout the years in many ways ex RU players such as Ridge, and Halligan turned 4 point tries into 6 pointers (or 5 points). No more toe hackers feature and all NRL clubs have 70% + goal kickers
3, Drop Kicks -1 pointers can be the difference between winning and losing
Struggling now ... help me out
Given RL was born in 1895 with a rule book and on-field game 100% the same as RU, then I presume for the sake of this argument you have to limit it to items RL adopted from RU between 1895 and today.
Which rules out Items 1 and 3 above (otherwise you would include the ball, goal posts, whistle etc).
In regard to Item 2 the accuracy in goal kicking is more to do with advances in the shape/technology of ball design, kicking tees and players being fulltime and thus having time to train. As a trend, NFL had round-the-corner "side-winder" kickers long before either of the rugby codes, and I'm not entirely sure who influenced Halligan and Ridge to adopt that style. It was in Sydney RL consistently since John Gray in the late 1970s.
The (now infamous) torso try rule appears to have been added to RL just after RU in the mid 1960s.
The five-eighth position was in NZ rugby before anywhere else in either code.
Differential scrum penalties.
Kicking tee (not sure).
Spiral lateral passes?
Wok Ryan once mentioned slide defence came from RU. Not sure about that.