Pommy
Coach
- Messages
- 14,657
Is it majority or unanimous that decides it? Hearing there at least 4 clubs voting for them to be relegated for going bust.
Whilst taking money from the government to stop themselves going bust. Classy.
Is it majority or unanimous that decides it? Hearing there at least 4 clubs voting for them to be relegated for going bust.
Not to be too pessimistic, but a lot of the clubs never have been in the past so why would we expect them to be now.Tomorrow is the big day. Really hoping the super league is pro expansion.
Not to be too pessimistic, but a lot of the clubs never have been in the past so why would we expect them to be now.
Unless there's something tangible in it for them of course, then they'll be all for it.
I'm not asking for altruism, I'm asking for certain English clubs to treat others how they would like to be treated and to have a little bit of long term thinking instead of being incapable of planning past the next few years.you make it sound like altruism should be a driving attribute of private businesses lol.
Is that the outcome of today’s meeting?Decision made in 4 weeks after a personal presentation from the prospective new owner.
Is that the outcome of today’s meeting?
I'm not asking for altruism, I'm asking for certain English clubs to treat others how they would like to be treated and to have a little bit of long term thinking instead of being incapable of planning past the next few years.
regardless of if it was bound to happen anyway or not they do have covid on their side thoughhang on, every other club who has gone into administration has been punished accordingly. I can’t think of one that has had to pull out of a season all together and failed to pay its players. SL has to have confidence that toronto are a viable club moving forward, the owner hasn’t yet given them evidence of that.
Pretty sure if my club hasn’t got a new owner by next season and tells SL it’s taking a year off until it can afford to play again they won’t just say, sure come back when you’re ready!
regardless of if it was bound to happen anyway or not they do have covid on their side though
Also the fact no side below had earned promotion by winning the championship. Who are you going to replace them with?
hang on, every other club who has gone into administration has been punished accordingly. I can’t think of one that has had to pull out of a season all together and failed to pay its players. SL has to have confidence that toronto are a viable club moving forward, the owner hasn’t yet given them evidence of that.
Pretty sure if my club hasn’t got a new owner by next season and tells SL it’s taking a year off until it can afford to play again they won’t just say, sure come back when you’re ready!
You could possibly do that but they were hardly the favourites to go back up this year, so would still be a bit unfair. Plus their ground is too small and they need to have a plan of getting more support. At least in their short existence the Wolfpack have found a way to get bums on seats London have never attempted to get anyone to jump on board.London as the last club relegated, and an expansion club to boot.
Rob Elstone with SL will probably have to investigate Ottawa as well, only have to look at the NZ Warriors situation over here. Should covid improve you'd look at having Toronto & Ottawa back (maybe NY too?), if not SL would be better having Toulouse or London replace them for now.
They can't for the same reason the pacific teams being added to the nsw/qld cups couldn't form there ownToronto Ottawa New York should form a breakaway North American professional league
Maybe adding a Jamaica team
Are we just pretending that English clubs wouldn’t have gone in to administration without the government helping out?