I’d speculate to answer that by stating that by and large, most clubs are prepared to play alleged and actual rogues if they feel their services are of use. Lodge, Norman, May and Packer et al.
I haven’t heard he was trouble, just the usual young nrl lad. People will know more than me on that front.
Not that this is really relevant to the allegations or his defence in the case.
I think McGregor and Hook passed him up on lack of ability or promise in comparison to others available or the club is seeking. Rightly or wrongly, a coaching business decision.
That’s my stab at it, but happy to corrected though.
Agree with all you have said ,and the part of your post I highlighted is the part that is something that has to be rammed home with these young guys that they can no longer be.
We keep seeing this happening with young blokes and some not so young getting themselves into situations that are life changing, and if proven abhorrent and rightly deserving of an appropriate sentence, so the message isn't getting through .
Times have changed and being a usual young NRL lad is going to require squeaky clean behaviour and being one of the boys then brushing under the carpet 'isn't possible any more.
Obviously any of the type of behaviour that is alleged has never been ok ,but I think some of these guys think they are above accountability as they no doubt watch as some of the senior players get pandered to by their respective clubs.
NRL will need to be a lot more proactive getting the message across re accountability for actions than what they are doing now.
I agree with you though that young Sailor seemed to be without fault up to now regarding his behaviour
,and was probably unfortunate he had a couple of high salaried players blocking his path ,even though they are useless.