What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

TV deal short-changes NRL, says Crowe

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
100,947
Please tell us what point we don't get? Rusty's speaking an obvious and universal truth... Just because he's brought it up doesn't mean anything will happen. We live in hope but I don't like our chances. Call me a cynic but that's how it is.
 

Y2Eel

First Grade
Messages
8,176
Please tell us what point we don't get? Rusty's speaking an obvious and universal truth... Just because he's brought it up doesn't mean anything will happen. We live in hope but I don't like our chances. Call me a cynic but that's how it is.

Its not just going to fix itself someone has to get out there and speak his mind hopefully now more people will be more outspoken!
 

Tiger Hawk

Bench
Messages
2,928
Maybe diehard league fans know it but casual league fans wouldn't and whilst Crowe saying something won't necessarily do anything, at least it raises general public awareness.
 

drake

First Grade
Messages
5,433
Let's just stay silent an say nothing.

I mean, being made to look like an arse by an academy award winning actor who half owns one of the NRL teams is no big deal, is it?

For f**k's sake, just because a bad thing has been brought to light before does not mean that it should not be talked about anymore. Shout it from the rooftops; make the idiots that short changed the public look like idiots.

Average Joe/Jane does not know or care what a journo or CEO says, but if a celebrity says it, it's important.
 

TeZbIaN

Juniors
Messages
48
Let's just stay silent an say nothing.

I mean, being made to look like an arse by an academy award winning actor who half owns one of the NRL teams is no big deal, is it?

For f**k's sake, just because a bad thing has been brought to light before does not mean that it should not be talked about anymore. Shout it from the rooftops; make the idiots that short changed the public look like idiots.

Average Joe/Jane does not know or care what a journo or CEO says, but if a celebrity says it, it's important.

Spot On! Couldn't have said it better.
 

Ziggy the God

First Grade
Messages
5,240
Let's just stay silent an say nothing.

I mean, being made to look like an arse by an academy award winning actor who half owns one of the NRL teams is no big deal, is it?

For f**k's sake, just because a bad thing has been brought to light before does not mean that it should not be talked about anymore. Shout it from the rooftops; make the idiots that short changed the public look like idiots.

Average Joe/Jane does not know or care what a journo or CEO says, but if a celebrity says it, it's important.


What Drake said.
 
Messages
10,970
was in the telegraph today as well.

the more people in the media pick up on this the more pressure will be brought to bear on gallop and the networks.
 

The Gunner

Juniors
Messages
54
Can someone tell me how to jack up the price for the free to air rights if ONLY Channel 9 wants them?
As it stands at the moment neither 7 or 10 could afford anything more than the overpriced AFL rights.
The NRL could get less if 9 is the only player .. and that is possible.
 

buster bunny

Juniors
Messages
267
Gallop tells Crowe to stick to his day job
By Liam FitzGibbon
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,23994403-5001023,00.html
July 09, 2008 12:00am


NRL chief executive David Gallop has told South Sydney co-owner Russell Crowe to stick to his day job.

The NRL hit back today at claims by the Hollywood superstar that rugby league is being shortchanged by an unfair television deal compared to the AFL.

Crowe said on a Sydney radio station he felt league was "the poor cousin'' in Australian sport and the NRL must negotiate a better deal in the future.

Rugby league's television deal is worth around $500 million over six years, compared to the AFL's which is worth $780 million over five years. But Gallop defended the current deal, saying it had helped grow the competition.

"Russell Crowe is a great actor but is in no position to speak on this issue with any level of expertise,'' Gallop said today. "People should remember that we brought forward new revenue to the game before the previous contracts expired and this allowed us to bring the Gold Coast Titans into the competition.

"The strategic importance of this move is now being realised as one looks at the plans of the other codes trying to expand to the Gold Coast.''

Gallop said it was unfair to draw comparisons between the AFL and NRL's television deals. "There are also some facts people have to accept in relation to the AFL aside from the peculiar circumstances of their last period of negotiation,'' Gallop said of the intensely-competitive bidding between free-to-air commercial networks for the AFL rights.

"The AFL has teams in more states and draws crowds more than twice the size of ours. Television is sold on the basis of five capital-city audiences and we do not have that footprint. It also isn't a solution for us to simply throw a team in those areas where we have limited interest in our code.

"Also, the AFL has an extra game on free-to-air, its games go for 20 per cent longer than a league game and allow for greater advertising revenue.''

Gallop said he was confident the game would grow television but said the process would not be helped by "people misrepresenting the current situation''.

Crowe said on Monday he felt rugby league had the better television product to sell. "We've got the greatest TV game but we're in the situation where we're the poor cousin when it comes to money and that's not good,'' Crowe said

Why does Gallop always talk up the AFL in order to cover up his mistakes? He should be talking about how NRL dominates ratings rather than going on about the AFL being more national.
 

Lockyer4President!

First Grade
Messages
7,975
David Gallop said:
"The AFL has teams in more states and draws crowds more than twice the size of ours. Television is sold on the basis of five capital-city audiences and we do not have that footprint. It also isn't a solution for us to simply throw a team in those areas where we have limited interest in our code.
Hey David, this is why you are the CEO. If you can identify that these are the reasons why our tv deal is lacking then DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. FFS...

If it was up to him we wouldn't have teams in NZ or Melbourne.
 
Top