You said the arl imposed travel costs on the new teams and they weren’t told beforehand and they would’ve gone broke because of this
Then like a month ago you said it was as because they added two extras teams and the extra costs of travel and accomodation for two extra teams (40k ? Lol) would send them broke
Both reasons are bs
The podcast cited above says the reds were very poorly managed
No I never, stop making sht up!
Everyone knows the travel costs were agreed in 1992 when the clubs were given licenses. What wasnt known was the ARL was going to add an side and travel costs on top of the original agreement. It wasnt about adding 2 extra teams, it was about adding an extra side for the clubs to run.
Look at what the Reds did, it was pretty amazing in terms of building for the future. Linking with Sth Africa, bringing across a stack of talented young players from East coast and placing them with WARL clubs, funding WARL clubs directly so they could improve development pathways at a local level, choosing an iconic brand, positive marketing that got 26k to the WACA for game 1, building a solid player roster etc etc
Sure they made mistakes, what new club doesnt, but from what Ive seen and heard from people involved at that time they did a pretty good start up job. Shame SL came along and we never got to see just where it might have gone. Might have been a financial disaster and folded anyways, or might have kept building and now be a very established club producing plenty of players. By the time year 3 came along News ltd were running the club and doing sht things. Cant blame the 92-96 board for that.
Not like they were orphans either, NQ went bust and had to be bailed out, Warriors went bust and had to be taken over and Crushers, like Reds, never got chance to show what they could have been.
But hey ho all in the past now.