What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WA BEARS

SirPies&Beers

Juniors
Messages
922
abdos turn

NRL to resume Perth talks after March state election​

Scott Bailey
Thu 13 February 2025 at 9:37 am AEST·3-min read

The NRL will reignite expansion talks with the Western Australian government following next month's state election, with Andrew Abdo still confident the league can go to 20 teams.

Initially expected to be announced last year, the Western Bears bid has been in a state of flux since the NRL knocked back the business consortium behind the initial proposal.

In the time since, Papua New Guinea's entrance has been confirmed for 2028 with the NRL leaving the door ajar for another side to enter in 2027.

Talks with the WA government have also remained ongoing to salvage the Perth project, after the NRL rejected a $20 million licence fee from the consortium.

AAP has been told the talks have been largely productive, with a $120 million backing to join the NRL along with further stadium and grassroots support.

Any further discussions will wait until after the March 8 state election, with the Labor party expected to retain government given they hold 53 of the 59 seats.

"Once that election is finished we will re-engage with the government and hopefully put a business case to the (ARL) Commission which will provide certainty for the next couple of years," NRL CEO Abdo told AAP.

"Nothing has been finalised and we need to work on it.

"It won't be rushed, it would be something the Commission needs to be very, very clear on. We are doing that work.

"These decisions are really important because they fall decades into the future. We want to make sure we have all the analysis done."

Any Perth side will still form a marriage with North Sydney, carrying the Bears name and parts of the foundation club's heritage.
North Sydney Bears players celebrating.

North Sydney Bears players celebrate a try in the 2024 NSW Cup final against Newtown. (HANDOUT/NEW SOUTH WALES RUGBY LEAGUE)

The NRL had appeared almost certain to be headed towards a 20-team competition with three new sides by 2032 when they called for bids last year.

But after initially indicating a master plan could be completed shortly after last October's grand final, the slow going since then has raised questions over its likelihood.

A move to 20 teams would allow the NRL to alter season length and structure, potentially adding conferences, playing less rounds and allowing for more representative football.

"The motivation, vision and opportunity has been consistent. Certainly there is positive momentum for that," Abdo said.

"But the actual decision making about what that looks like and what the financial and football eco-system looks like, we are making good progress.

"We are moving closer towards the certainty our stakeholders are seeking. We are adding pieces to the puzzle as we go.

"It was never a fait-accompli. But I am optimistic because the game is growing and we have unbelievable athletes.

"And as we saw with the expansion of the Dolphins and the women's game, you create opportunities for more talent and players to come through our pathways."
Dolphins players enter the field at Suncorp Stadium.

The Dolphins run out in front of a full Suncorp Stadium against the Broncos. (Jono Searle/AAP PHOTOS)

Abdo's comments come as a Mana Pasifika bid, based out of Eden Park in Auckland and representing the people of Samoa, Tonga, the Cook Islands, Niue and Tokelau became the latest to throw its hat into the ring as 20th team last week.

After PNG's inclusion, Abdo said the door was not shut on another side representing the Pacific.

"Nothing has been ruled out for team 19 or team 20," he said.

"We are the biggest sport in the Pacific and we want rugby league to be the language that binds us all together.

"The opportunity to have another team long term in New Zealand or the Pacific, we would be crazy not to look at that."
 

SirPies&Beers

Juniors
Messages
922
this is the 6th or 7th reporter stating the $120m grass roots funding. is he wrong too? heaps of news has been coming out since west aussie gov went into caretaker mode. thought it was suppose to be less. ding, dong

seems like vlandys and abdo are very much leading from the front in keeping the west aussie bears name warm in the media in recent times. its how good operators are suppose to do it for something they very much want to be come to fruition.
 
Last edited:

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
35,740
article mentions 3 key demands but only lists 2.
1) development, grassroots, pathways and investment and ) stadium upgrade funding. safe to assume the third one is coe unless we are looking at it the wrong way and 3rd is bears brand for reasons spoken about ad nauseum by all relevant parties including those that matter.

I know I looked a few times for the third one and couldn’t find it

FMD league journos are awful
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
35,740
this is the 6th or 7th reporter stating the $120m grass roots funding. is he wrong too? heaps of news has been coming out since west aussie gov went into caretaker mode. thought it was suppose to be less. ding, dong

seems like vlandys and abdo are very much leading from the front in keeping the west aussie bears name warm in the media in recent times. its how good operators are suppose to do it for something they very much want to be come to fruition.
Red bear said it six weeks before

These journos are dead set useless and it’s their main job
 

SirPies&Beers

Juniors
Messages
922

WA Election 2025: Liberals to bring an election fight over Western Bears NRL side​

Perth’s proposed NRL side has become an election issue, with Liberal leader Libby Mettam ruling out cutting an expensive taxpayer-funded deal to secure a western team.
In what will set up a post-election political fight over the funding, Ms Mettam has told The West Australian Premier Roger Cook needed to be open with WA about what he is willing to pay to bring a side west.
In revelations in east coast media this week, Mr Cook reportedly had discussions with Australian Rugby League boss Peter V’Landys in the final days before caretaker mode started on February 5.
It is understood that as part of the fresh round of talks, the NRL finalised its three key demands, including $120 million licence fee to join the premiership, grassroots investment and a $200m upgrade of HBF Park for a team facility.
Ms Mettam seized on the reports, accusing the Premier of using taxpayers to “fund his hobby”.
“Is this seriously the priority of Roger Cook? It’s totally appalling to learn he was having a secret meeting with Sydney businessmen just weeks before an election,” Ms Mettam said.
Cyclone Zelia to reach category 5 system on Thursday before crossing coast, bringing destructive winds
“At its most basic our government must ensure quality accessible health care, ensuring you are safe and that you can afford a roof over your head. This is my priority.
”WA deserves a rugby team, but we should not be handing hundreds of millions of dollars to east coast businessmen to secure it.”
The Liberals would not rule out making some form of payment, but it is understood the stadium upgrades were deemed unnecessary, given rugby teams currently play games there, while no other team was required to pay licence fee.
Under a proposal to bring WA into the NRL, the North Sydney Bears would be relocated to Perth, and be rebadged as the “Western Bears”.
But a private consortium — lead by Cash Converters founder Peter Cumins — was rejected by the NRL, with a preference to cutting a deal with the State Government instead.
WA Election 2025: Labor MP Paul Lilburne resorts to name-calling opponent
Speaking to The Daily Telegraph, Mr V’landys said the talks with the State Government had been “very positive”.
“I have been talking to the WA premier and I am very comfortable and confident with where we are at,” he said.
“I appreciate there is an election on (in Western Australia), but I’m confident after the election we will come to an arrangement.”
Calling the side “Roger’s Rugby Team”, Ms Mettam called for the Premier to be transparent over what funding he would commit to secure the Western Bears.
“With an election weeks away, voters deserve to know how much Labor is planning to give some Sydney businessmen for Roger’s Rugby Team,” she said.
“A Mettam Liberal Government will fight to bring a team here, but we will not be signing a cheque for hundreds of millions when we have the worst hospital system in the country.
“When we have 2011-level real wages, the worst hospitals in the country, and the worst housing market in the country, there is no bigger misplaced priority than Roger’s Rugby Team.
“WA Labor cannot treat voters as mugs – we deserve to know what has been promised to bring Roger’s Rugby Team to WA.”


this is probably why even if its true and there's agreements already in place between west aussie labor gov and nrl/arlc everyone is being coy, using same language and saying little as far as that goes. screams nda as far as particular details go because cookie probably knows liberals will used it against him and labor should anything more be let out.

all lines up, every piece of it. red bears said awhile back why the whole thing ie how progressed it actually is being played down! because of could happen if too much becomes known pre election and this article is insinuating exactly that!

in other news west aussie liberals dont know different between rugby league and rugby union.
 

SirPies&Beers

Juniors
Messages
922
Jeeze do we really want to go to a state where a lot of people hate rugby league so much when there are places that are begging for a team

120 million license fee ???? Lmao
$120m isnt even for a fee its basically to help fund juniors who want to play the game with better facilities, programs etc. $12m per financial year for 10 years for kids sport is peanuts, it really is.

also hbf will eventually get upgrades, nrl club or not. probable nrl club is just expediates it quicker thats all. nrl club is not the crux because facilities and stadiums all age and eventually need upgrades or replacements regardless!

red bears really has hit the nail on the head with so much stuff he said last few months. can you share what he told ya? you said he alluded to stuff ie liberals, elections, and too much info being used as an election topic (even when people here openly mocked that and said nrl being a west aussie election topic wouldn't happen or be a thing lol!!!) etc proof is literally here
 
Last edited:

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,663
If they just replicate the existing two good stands on the other side it will be a v.good stadium

I suspect the main grandstand will be tarted up a bit more for corporates

They better not leave that shed the glory can get stuffed their fan base only fits in one stand anyway
Shed can stay but be developed. It is unique and adds a different flavour to stadium, offers cheap tickets for those who cant afford $60-80 and adds a couple of thousand to capcity at low cost if extended. Extend it full width and put a modern cantilever roof to match the east stand roof and its perfect.

extended shed.jpg
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,663
Not surprised with the Libs, was only going to use it as a political football (excuse the pun) if the deal wasnt done in October which it should have been. Fingers crossed now we dont get a shock election result.
 

SirPies&Beers

Juniors
Messages
922
Not surprised with the Libs, was only going to use it as a political football (excuse the pun) if the deal wasnt done in October which it should have been. Fingers crossed now we dont get a shock election result.
how would the deal have been done in october when the bid wasn't up to scratch & half arsed? fmd you need to move on cob.

perthwrongs, ding dong ya need to move along
1739417343277.png
 

Latest posts

Top