Yeah it's good. Pretty realistic action scenes for an early 80s film.Just found out about an early 80’s WW 2 flick called the The Big Red One. Lee Marvin and a young Mark Hamill. Anyone rate or not.
We'll have to agree to disagree, pretty sure I would have disliked the movie even if I hadn't read the book. Pretty deflating leaving the cinema after watching it and personally expecting something a lot better.never read the book . i just liked the film
I'll second that. Definitely worth watching.Yeah it's good. Pretty realistic action scenes for an early 80s film.
An old school war movie I can always watch again is Kelly’s Heroes. What a class line up of actors from that era. That piece at the end when both the US troops and the German Tank Commander decide it’s time to get rich and stop shooting at each other is a great finish to this film.
I watched it again a few months ago. You are correct in thinking it still holds up.12 O'Clock High with Gregory Peck was probably the first WW2 movie I saw as a kid. It was an old movie then, made not long after the war.
Pretty sure it still holds up as a great movie.
I dislike this movie hugely.
Was supposed to be awesome:
1. It was based on a decent book.
2. Malick was hyped.
Was actually:
1. Basically ignored the source material, eschewing narrative and structure for a B/S romanticised travelogue and a bunch of cameos.
2. Malick is way overhyped.
I think that's pretty easy. Apocalypse Now closely followed by The Deer Hunter.Lets not muck around guys. I want you to make a call on the greatest Vietnam War movie ever!!!!! TOP 3 if you need to!
"The Deer Hunter"......interesting movie. Personally (I don't knock people who do like it), I think no movie in film history needed footage cut from the final product more than that film. That wedding scene....f**k me, I think it went for around a f**king hour.I think that's pretty easy. Apocalypse Now closely followed by The Deer Hunter.
I won't argue that it could have benefited from being trimmed a little (yes the wedding in particular could have been shortened).However there can be no doubting that the Russian Roulette scene is one of the most powerful in movie history."The Deer Hunter"......interesting movie. Personally (I don't knock people who do like it), I think no movie in film history needed footage cut from the final product more than that film. That wedding scene....f**k me, I think it went for around a f**king hour.
Great performances, a couple of very tense scenes which were incredible......otherwise, I just think the film went too damn long. I watched it again over a year ago and my opinion had not changed.
Good pick with Casualties of War. It's been a long time since I last watched it, I'll have to dig out my DVD,For me, 1) Full Metal Jacket and 2) Apocalypse Now are clear cut. My third pick is not known anywhere near as much but it is pretty damn good in Casualties of War with Michael J Fox and Sean Penn
Im struggling to think of a better scene in film history to be honest. The previous events of that film added to the impact of that scene.I won't argue that it could have benefited from being trimmed a little (yes the wedding in particular could have been shortened).However there can be no doubting that the Russian Roulette scene is one of the most powerful in movie history.
One of the great film mysteries to me was the ignoring of this film by audiences and critics. Brian De Palma directed it and Fox and Penn deliver excellent performance. Quite a few of the support cast went onto great careers too. Based on a true story, tense as hell....a mystery to me as to why it doesn't get much recognition.Good pick with Casualties of War. It's been a long time since I last watched it, I'll have to dig out my DVD,
I think it's partly that it was such a big departure from Alex P Keaton for Fox. However De Palma films usually garner a lot of interest from critics, so yes it is a mystery. I've also remembered another lesser known Vietnam movie thats worth watching - 84 Charlie Mopic.One of the great film mysteries to me was the ignoring of this film by audiences and critics. Brian De Palma directed it and Fox and Penn deliver excellent performance. Quite a few of the support cast went onto great careers too. Based on a true story, tense as hell....a mystery to me as to why it doesn't get much recognition.
I tend to agree with you about the casting of Michael J Fox. He was in a lot of light comedy movies and a teen idol at that time. My dad just could not cop his movies and think people had issues with accepting him in that role. In saying that, I thought he was fantastic. I'll look up 84 Charlie Mopic....I've never heard of it.I think it's partly that it was such a big departure from Alex P Keaton for Fox. However De Palma films usually garner a lot of interest from critics, so yes it is a mystery. I've also remembered another lesser known Vietnam movie thats worth watching - 84 Charlie Mopic.
It's lower budget with a cast of unknowns but definitely worth watching.I'll look up 84 Charlie Mopic....I've never heard of it.