TruSaint
Referee
- Messages
- 20,858
HI tru is that what the C next to my name, at times means........? mmmm I thought it meant something else.......:lol:
:lol::lol:
cheeky bugger ;-)
HI tru is that what the C next to my name, at times means........? mmmm I thought it meant something else.......:lol:
Don't want to be a downer but I heard today that it's now highly likely Widdop will be gone next year.
If it eventuates we will be in a bit of a pickle. Not easy to replace a 5/8.
But excellent win!!!
I think widdop needs to organise and benji needs to pick and choose his moments to run. Sometimes the more benji tries, the worse the outcome.
A big factor today also was Rein, he seemed to really go up a few gears when Marshall left. The challenge is if he can do this most weeks. Problem is, rein will give you one of these standout performances every few months, then the coach thinks he can play the full 80 minutes, only for him to have a shocker the following week. Today really showed how important it is to have a utility on the bench.
Widdop has played 2 previous games without Benji why not the same result? I would not go be calling for the axing of Benji just yet.
Benji set up the second try with a pass only probably JT could have thrown. Absolute class act. Warriors were down 10-0 and when they go down a couple of tries never really come back and win. The damage was done. Not taking away from Widdop he was brilliant but I would rather Benji with Widdop in the halves than without. If anything this game may have boosted Widdop's confidence to demand the ball more and make Benji feel more at ease and not have to try and score or create a try with every play.
Not aware of anyone calling for Marshall to be axed. It would be rash to do so. But for what it's worth, I rate Widdop higher as a long term investment. He comes across as potentially more consistent, a natural leader and has the hallmarks of a complete Rugby League player. Plus he has more years left in him than Marshall.Slippery Morris said:Widdop has played 2 previous games without Benji why not the same result? I would not go be calling for the axing of Benji just yet.
Sorry to disagree but that was heart in mouth stuff. The way I saw it, he threw the pass without looking to an unmarked winger, who had some work to do just to catch it. Ball should have been on the chest but instead he had to dive forward to save the situation. Marshall was looking at the defence when he threw the ball. It looked fancy, but didn't need to be.Benji set up the second try with a pass only probably JT could have thrown. Absolute class act.
Not sure what you mean by "the damage was done" but FTR, Marshall left the field when we were leading 4-0, not 10-0. And the second try was manufactured by Rein. The Warriors were still in the match imo, and came close to scoring on at least two occasions. We only really gained the ascendancy early in the second half.Slippery Morris said:Warriors were down 10-0 and when they go down a couple of tries never really come back and win. The damage was done.
Will you be betting $1m on this? I'm looking to extend the shed.
Haven't we already been through this about eleventy million times?
Yeah I will take his bet 😃
Should benji and widdow swap jerseys (and positions) Garrath being more settled could control the play better as first receiver and let benji show his flair at 6 instead..