Wests Tigers take over bid

[Mr Spock!]

Viewpoint supporting union noted.

You're not going too well with your posts.

Do really need to start making crap up?

 

[Mr Spock!]

We already have, but hey, you noticed... Souffs took 4 decades off and nobody noticed that either...

Who???

The West tigers....

No one would care nor march for them.....

 

[Mr Spock!]

Home I guess after North Sydney management sent the club broke. Norths didnt get "kicked out", nor did they get "forced" into a merger with Manly. They went broke and into administration prior.



Something is better than nothing. Manly merged with Norths after Norths went into administration.

Yeah they did.

And as we saw something was really nothing.

It was a f**ked up union which everyone hated.

Oh and...Cronulla, West Tigers, the Warriors and the Gold Coast have had far worse debts than the Bears.

Once again, other clubs fans can go f**ked.

 

[Mr Spock!]

Why ?

Some stand alone clubs in Sydney and outside of Sydney have not won the comp in nrl era yet tigers have won a comp .

That is blatantly false.

Btw the whole cyclical argument is what was being argued at the time of Superleague.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

You're not going too well with your posts.

Do really need to start making crap up?

Perhaps I could write a book of feuds?

Who???

The West tigers....

No one would care nor march for them.....

And the souffs that people marched for doesn't exist anymore either. What's your point?

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Once again, other clubs fans can go f**ked.

Exactly. So how is the opinion of a souffs fan relevant here?

 

[Mr Spock!]

Let me explain this to you slowly.......some Souffs MENSA members here have been putting forward the suggestion that Wests & Balmain are dead as a result of the Tigers JV. Some cheeky Tigers fans have responded that the same applies to Souffs as they sold out to their two fairy godfathers. "No...no...no its the same club" the toothless but faithful cry.

Your post cleary illustrates that the board representation of the previous club at Souffs is exactly the same as that of Balmain at WT.

A club isn't a board. It's more than that.



Look at EPL and NBA where you have billionaire owners changing teams all the time.

Does Manchester United no longer exist because it has a new owner? Because it was taken over by a rich consortium, it is no longer the same club with no history?

That's the dumbest attempt at an argument ever.

Btw other clubs like Souths are Manly, Melbourne, Brisbane.

 

[Mr Spock!]

Perhaps I could write a book of feuds?


And the souffs that people marched for doesn't exist anymore either. What's your point?

Perhaps you could....

It could be called the book of snooze.....

Souths exist the same as Manchester United and Liverpool exist.

Unless you're saying that soccer clubs no longer exist when they change owners.

It's really a stupid argument.

But I know it's all you got because you sold out your club and it no longer exists.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Perhaps you could....

It could be called the book of snooze.....

Souths exist the same as Manchester United and Liverpool exist.

Unless you're saying that soccer clubs no longer exist when they change owners.

It's really a stupid argument.

But I know it's all you got because you sold out your club and it no longer exists.

The hypocrisy and inconsistency of your argument is noted. Perhaps rusty could make a movie about it.

 

[Mr Spock!]

The hypocrisy and inconsistency of your argument is noted. Perhaps rusty could make a movie about it.

The only hypocrisy I see is from you.

I mean your club bent down to Murdoch and folded like a little bitch.

We fought him even if it meant being thrown out.

Which happened btw with support from your club.

Now you have the gall to tell us we're no longer the same club because of our board structure.

Try applying that argument to other clubs.

It's the height of stupidity.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

The only hypocrisy I see is from you.

I mean your club bent down to Murdoch and folded like a little bitch.

We fought him even if it meant being thrown out.

Which happened btw with support from your club.

Now you have the gall to tell us we're no longer the same club because of our board structure.

Try applying that argument to other clubs.

It's the height of stupidity.

Souffs

Sold.

The.

Club.

They adapted to survive. We adapted to survive. Souths were more than happy to see Newtown and Wests thrown out. Any evidence of support there? No?

Be consistent mate.

 

[Mr Spock!]

You

Sold.

The.

Club.

Be consistent mate.

The

same

as

Manchester United

and

Liverpool

and

Chicago Bulls

and

New York Yankees

and

Manly


Be consistent mate.

And honest.

Stooping to Murdoch's level isn't a great look.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

The

same

as

Manchester United

and

Liverpool

and

Chicago Bulls

and

New York Yankees

and

Manly


Be consistent mate.

And honest.

Stooping to Murdoch's level isn't a great look.

Comparing an NRL club to Liverpool, Man U, the Chicago bulls or the NY Yankees is the height of delusional grandeur and hubris that only a souffs fan could possibly believe. They're not universally worshipped or viewed as special. Other fans marched out of pity then. To assume they ever would again is a fantasy.

 

[mave]

f**k the Bears.

 

[Mr Spock!]

Comparing an NRL club to Liverpool, Man U, the Chicago bulls or the NY Yankees is the height of delusional grandeur and hubris that only a souffs fan could possibly believe. They're not universally worshipped or viewed as special. Other fans marched out of pity then. To assume they ever would again is a fantasy.

It's exactly the same whether an owner is a millionaire or a billionaire.

According to YOU, Manchester United no longer has any history because rich owners....

But that's your hypocrisy showing.

And I would sooner my club die than bow down to Murdoch and become some other soulless entity devoid of history.

 

[Mr Spock!]

f**k the Bears.

They were...

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

And I would sooner my club die than bow down to Murdoch and become some other soulless entity devoid of history.

So you bent over for rusty instead...
Nobody is denying souffs have history dating back to 1908. To assume the Wests Tigers history doesn't go back to the same year is obviously incorrect, yet that seems to be what you believe, which is clearly inconsistent logic.

 

[Mr Spock!]

So you bent over for rusty instead...

Would you say the same if Crowe bought Liverpool?

Why are NRL clubs viewed differently?

Anyway Crowe isn't Murdoch.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Would you say the same if Crowe bought Liverpool?

Why are NRL clubs viewed differently?

Anyway Crowe isn't Murdoch.

And a house isn't yours after you sell it either...

 

[Mr Spock!]

And a house isn't yours after you sell it either...

Once again how is it different to EPL and other sports?

We know why you're doing this and its pretty cringy.