Maroubra Eel
Coach
- Messages
- 19,044
Maybe I have a short memory but I can't remember seeing kk do much.
I can remember seeing Mateo do plenty.
I can remember seeing Mateo do plenty.
Mitchell needs to come in and replace him
Based on what? How is his form for Wenty? Easy to say we should replace Keating but Mitchell has to have the runs on the board to do so.
And was responded withI was quite impressed with Kingston when i saw Wentworthville play the other day. He was brought in to be both back-up AND to put pressure on Keating to perform. And really Keating has not really performed thus far. So give Kingston a go.
http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/s...ston+keating+username_ElectricEelMan_usernamehate to break it to you mate, but Matt Keating is far superior 9 than Kinga and if you ever see matt play for Wenty you'll know why.
I wrote this last year
And was responded with
http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/s...ston+keating+username_ElectricEelMan_username
Just saying ....
Kingston up until that point in time had played first grade with the Sharks and Wenty were winning games. Difference is Mitchell hasn't played any first grade and Wenty have won one game and let two others slide away.
I have some big wraps on Mitchell but he won't have the same impact that Kingston did..... not yet anyway.
Maybe you are right ... maybe.
Though I am a bit bias. I think Matt Keating is barely a first grader to begin with.
I disagree. He is a good hooker that is suffering from our forwards being dominated in the ruck...... the play the ball speed is really slowing up his service as much as the step/pass habit he has fallen into.
Not sure a rookie hooker will change that much until our forwards are getting through the advantage line...
Maybe I have a short memory but I can't remember seeing kk do much.
I can remember seeing Mateo do plenty.
Korn i dunno if it's hate but to some [myself included] we have been hearing that he has enormous potential and that in many peoples eyes he will solve the 7 0r 6 position for us for well into the future.Now like alot of you we've seen the pennas, lawlers, morans, witts, who have had similar wraps and no offense nothing has really come of it.I can see the kid has some potential just not warranting some of bold opinions expressed but mate i'm happy to be proven wrong.CheersMateo has been around since 04, KK 08, of course you have seen Mateo do more!
KK is still very young (21?), what is Mateo, 26? 4 more years of first grade footy.
I am not for one minute suggesting that KK is better than Mateo or that Mateo can't be a great player but if attitude is anything to go by i would back KK any day over Mateo!
I think KK has added more spark to our side in ever game he has played, he always looks dangerous and with more experience and a more dominant forward pack i have no doubt he will shine.
Mateo looks like he needs an attitude adjustment, that is my opinion, he doesn't look interested unless he gets what he wants. With the right attitude he could be anything in this game, i think John Sutton suffers from the same problem as Mateo and could also be anything if he applies himself.........
I still don't get the hate for KK though, i am trying to understand what he has done wrong besides a forward pass???
KK's maturity and calmness on the field while remaining intense is what excites me about his future. All he needs to do is harness that and we've got one special player.