foreverinourshadow
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,400
jack napier dont be nasty to r20 its disrespectful
Listen to R95.
He is a fellow truth teller.
Ch 9 miscounted it. They do that in games from other teams too.
On League Live app it said 7-1.
jack napier dont be nasty to r20 its disrespectful
Did he post the penalty count somewhere?
I don't watch ch9. Did they claim it was 7-1?
http://live.nrlstats.com/matches/nrl/match43698.html
Nrlstats agrees with me. Provide some proof of your 7-1. I guarantee you can't.
I saw it on League Live app. Unfortunately I can't get info off there onto here.
So I'm the only one who can provide proof, yet you claimed my info was wrong?
He's a moron. Don't worry shadow.
Southsport is a fellow truth teller and can set Nape in his place.
Lol@Rorters. Poor Nape needs a bib and a tissue box.
lol asking others to fight your battles.
Lol@ crying over a post on a forum. No where's my tissues and bib bitch lol
Well you ain't getting the point from me.
Sir Southsport or Newc can have a go at setting you in your place. We all know you've been in trouble at that wretched hotel and have been tricky to deal with.
We all know Nape isn't thinking clearly with his Rorters on the bottom and all.
Give your coach a tissue box, he needs it:lol::lol:
So do you too coming dead last:lol:
You whining for Piss doggy boy. There there Nape. Calm down Nape.
That's a good lad shadow, Sook20 was waiting for someone to intervene.
What's up Jack, you don't normally carry on like this?
What do you think of Robbo's spray yesterday? Apparently the refs copped some in the tunnel after the game too!
jack napier is infactuated with r20
Its funny that you mentioned that Robinson's spray was calculated because I thought exactly the same thing, especially when I heard that Nick Politis was sitting in on it. Chances are that they would have discussed it before hand and Politis would have given him the green light to unleash on Cummins. What the Roosters have to gain from it is an interesting question. Jack Gibson used to frequently criticise referees as a way of creating a seize mentality while also trying to get referees to lighten up on his teams. Basically the logic is that a referee who comes under criticism from a coach for being bias might lightening up a bit so as not confirm the coaches claims and ultimately to protect his job.It was a calculated spray and Robbo would definitly know a bigger than 10k fine would be on the way. I thought he raised some good points, particularly the bunker should not be acting as the match review committee.
The problem is the spray at cummins and its timing, whilst I agree with what he says that cummins is rubbish, we were gifted 2 tries yesterday from dodgy refereeing so it's gonna make him look a bit silly. Cummins does talk to captains like they're pieces of shit sometimes. I get he doesn't have to answer questions all the time but he goes about like a complete prick.
We still lost due to our own performance and thankfully Robbo stated this as well before his spray.
Last years Robbo ripped in and called out the fact we never receive more than 1 second half penalty, it started turning around after that as the issue highlighted in the media.
Nick will happily pay the fine as I believe he would've been more upset he didn't fire up.
I do apologise to yourself and other decent Souths fans on here like doyen, Diego and Bensville, but I just can't help but highlight how stupid R20 is a have decided to give him a little shit. I'll get bored soon enough and quieted down.
Well my info is accurate.
I was keeping count in the match too.
I'd rather not argue with you.
I'd like it if you left us alone on our Souths forum.