It's just agenda driven drivel from the Anderson lovers. Backing each other up as usual.
Pity they dont support the club over people who used to have roles in it.
I hope this forum isn't truly reflective of our whole fan base. Most of the anti Kearney / board sentiment is a result of people being disgruntled that someone they liked / knew / worked for / did business with is no longer in a position of power in the club- whether it be fitzgerald, Anderson, ovo or whoever
So in other words, if we don't like losing and get upset about how poor our coach is doing, there is an agenda?
Most of the time it is yourself or one of your like minded friends who bring bring up Fitzy or Anderson to try and belittle people, instead of actually forming an actual opinion!
My opinion is and has always been that Fitzy needed to go because he was corrupt and had overstayed his welcome, hence why I voted him out and don't regret it for one second! Anderson had a poor second year and was clearly not supported, it was also best he parted ways, however, an unproven rookie coach was not going to fix our issue and it is showing.
The majority of supporters I know just want to win, they don't analyse, watch the game several times or even necessarily go to games, they just want the team to win and don't want to go through "rebuilding" eras as someone else mentioned.
If getting rid of Hindy etc. is the solution, then so be it, I am happy for him to do what he thinks he needs to build his team BUT he still needs the team to be competitive which they have barely been for 30 odd matches now!
Not convinced he is the answer but next is his year, there are no excuses next year.......although I am sure it will be Fitzy OR Anderson's fault to some......
