Except, you know, the girl. Who was allegedly sexually assualted.
Which was assigned by an idiot doctor who did the same thing to a high-profile Union player because he couldn't be bothered to read the Banned Substances list both codes had provided him.
The NRL decided to give him a pass because they had a clear chain of causality and knew exactly what had happened.
Which is more than a little different than the scenario you're attempting to imply.
Thanks for that info. I didn't know that
Yet he was able to write it in warhorse, have it published in newspapers that are distributed in multiple states, and do it despite the fact that nothing had leaked about the story. Johns only appeared because he had been caught red-handed.
Webcke chose to be honest. After the fact, yes, but even then a choice rather than having had his hand forced.
here's where you are full of sh*t. Joey was caught with on ecstacy tablet. That is not an indication that the possessor has a prior history. Joey only had to say it was his first, and no-one would be any wiser.
But Joey decided to come clean, not just in a book, but also on TV, being interviewed. It took great courage. More courage than Tallis et al coming out after the fact and saying "I told you so"
Webcke, meanwhile - how do you know he didn't get his hand forced?
And Webcke bagging Johns re the TOTC is poor taste. Will he bag the old alcoholics that were picked in the forwards?