Who is the bigger cheat?

[Macca]

Obviously the chucker IMO.

 

[Anonymous]

Murili has been deemed not guilty. Therefore has cheated nobody.

Warne has been found guilty therefore is a "cheat". A cheat versus a non cheat. Easy one for me.

 

[Macca]

In your opinion BB, does Murili chuck or not?

 

[Hoggy]

Ranatunga.

 

[Kiwi]

I agree that warne is the only one of these two that has cheated, so my vote goes to him.

 

[Manly Preniers in 2005]

Mulari

 

[lolesi]

Ranatunga.

i agree

 

[weasel]

As much as I love Warnie, taking a banned drug with a fairly unconvincing excuse was stupid and he deserved the ban he got. The ICC have cleared Murali's bowling action and that's good enough for me.

 

[weasel]

Oh, you could have added Stephen Fleming as a third option.

 

[Dr Crane]

I don't think so weasel.

 

[Anonymous]

In your opinion BB, does Murili chuck or not?

I'll leave that up to the ICC. Just like what I think in an lbw decision is irrelevant so is my opinion on this.

 

[Twizzle]

You might be in a no win situation here McSharkie.

Technically Balmain Boy is right.

Warnie was the only one caught cheating.

If you are asking for people opinions, you may get a different answer, but the Murili thing has been over done.

 

[Tupac Shakur]

Murili has my vote.

 

[aqua_duck]

Well just because the ICC have cleared Murali's action, that means bugger all, they also condone Mugabe's regime, so does that mean you're ok with Mugabe's regime?

 

[Anonymous]

IMO they are both as legal as one another.

Not a prob with eiither of them.

 

[Anonymous]

I just think it's unfair on Murali to be called a cheat. He's doing he's thing, and he's being allowed to by the ICC. If the ICC called his action illegal he would change, he wouldn't try and deceive the ICC. Cheat is the wrong word.


Aqua_Duck, the ICC have not condoned Mugabe's regime, talk about manipulating words. All they've said is, cricket should not be used to make political statements, and so they do not agree with boycotting Zimbabwe tours in order to prove a political point - their interests is in furthering the game in Zimbabwe, which will not occur if no Internationals are played there.

And do I agree with this stance? Yes. Scheduling cricket games outside of Zimbabwe for political reasons will not change the situation there, but will be taking away from the people. Those who will suffer are those under Mugabe disgusting rule.

 

[ozbash]

SKW :lol:

 

[Doctor]

Shane Warne is guilty only of stupidity and immaturity.
Murali knows he chucks, the ICC knows he chucks, most international cricketers agree he chucks, and you only need two eyeballs in working order to see that his arm straightens significantly during the delivery swing (or delivery lob in his case).

No more discussion needed - chucking is against the laws of cricket, the ICC just doesn't have the guts to endanger the game in selected countries by removing their leading bowler/s.

It's a farcical situation really - a blot on cricket history that will never be erased. :?

 

[Kiwi]

Shane Warne is guilty only of stupidity and immaturity.
Murali knows he chucks, the ICC knows he chucks, most international cricketers agree he chucks, and you only need two eyeballs in working order to see that his arm straightens significantly during the delivery swing (or delivery lob in his case).

No more discussion needed - chucking is against the laws of cricket, the ICC just doesn't have the guts to endanger the game in selected countries by removing their leading bowler/s.

It's a farcical situation really - a blot on cricket history that will never be erased. :?

Rightio

 

[Macca]

100% correct Oswin. Anyone who knows anything about cricket would totally agree. Warney was stupid and copped a suspension. Murili cheats every day and get's away with it. Murili is the bigger cheat.