Who would you rather have? Part 1

[Stagger eel]

Lee Hopkins V Chad Robinson

honest opinions only!!

and must state why!!

 

[miniHINDY]

Hopkins
tries his best, loves the club and is probably a bit cheaper

 

[Belly in Brisvegas]

Hopkins
tries his best, loves the club and is probably a bit cheaper

Yeah I'd take Hopkins for the same reasons. Be interesting to see how "Chad MkII" comes back for us.

 

[Parraren]

Chad Robinson.

Why?

Easy; Grand Final winning experience, comes from a club with a winning culture & has been coached very well.

 

[Eelementary]

Although we completely outclassed the Chooks, I'd say Hopkins.

Robinson did not impress me.

I mean, both blokes have a great tackling technique.

But Hopkins looks to have found his attacking form from 2003 again and is looking good.

Plus I don't know what Robinson is capable of.

But we all saw how well Lee can play in '03.

 

[Stagger eel]

I can't decide!! I just can't!

I originally chose Hopo! however you have to consider what Chad has done and the enviroment he's been in over the last few years!

still have to think about it.

 

[strider]

if hopkins always played like he did last saturday night, then I would say hopkins for sure....but he hasn't played like that this season - injuries, bad form, etc

 

[The Colonel]

To be honest - I'd take Jack over either. I can see both playing first grade next year however moreso to cover injury, Origin or suspension.

 

[miniHINDY]

To be honest - I'd take Jack over either. I can see both playing first grade next year however moreso to cover injury, Origin or suspension.

I agree Jack is an awesome talent

 

[fish eel]

Chad.

Coming from a great culture.

 

[True EEL]

look hopefully we will have both.......you have to re-sign Hopkins, he is a true clubman and if Morris does play 5/8, i can see Hopkins being number 14 on the bench coming on for some impact and to play hooker for Riddell

 

[Freak]

Chad - Sorry Lee

Bigger, Faster,more skill Eg Offloading ability and probably a more consistant performer.

Both players underated but I just think Chad has more to offer.

 

[mickdo]

I'd say Robinson. I don't think Hopkins will be re-signed. He's been great for us, but I think his time may have come.

 

[Utey]

Hopkins hasnt played like he did for the roosters for about 1 year. So i choose robinson because he is just as good.

 

[Agent Mulder]

Chad Robinson.
Lee Hopkins has been great but i feel he is one his last legs.

Chad Robinson is a good bench player as well.

 

[Redback71]

why cant we just have both

id prefer hopkins he seems to like playing for the club too much and you can see it in his face when we loose or he stuffs up and he seems to give 100% and i dont know enough about "THE CHAD"

 

[Twizzle]

Lee Hopkins

much higher work rate and desire

Robinson will probably only be a bench player or PL player

 

[PJ Marshal]

Chad Robinson pretty much cemented a spot in the roosters 17 through great performances. Has grand final experiance

but in saying that Lee is a champion, great player!

too hard to decide

 

[wittyz chick]

Lee

like said above wears his heart on his sleeve. Is a great clubman.
I will neva forget that Melbourne game at Parra last yr when we lost n Lee was crying thats enough to show me he loves this club and thats what I want from our players!

 

[Utey]

actually good point seeing him cry was a sign that he does love the club. And he is getin his form back. so maybe