but rugby league is way more than a working class game in Australia
it’s defeatist saying League can’t get tv deals bigger than afl because it’s not played in private school
Before fully discovering RL in my early teens I grew up as a Soccer fan when that game`s image in England was dire. Fans were seen as utter scumbags and treated like caged animals. Today`s EPL would have been inconceivable without the drastic change of popular perception which began around the time of Italia 90.
I take your point that a lot has improved since the Winfield Cup days. But there remains an obvious socio-economic difference between RL in Sydney and Aussie Rules in Melbourne. This must be inimical to the image of RL in general.
I`ve seen figures that about a quarter of AFL players are privately educated. That is commensurate with AFL`s ability to draw more support from that stratum of society which has greater disposable income. Which affects attendances, memberships, merchandise sales. Which in turn influences the size of TV deals plus the quantity and quality of sponsors.
The only privately educated NRL players are those who played a different game at school. And NRL journalists are forever keen to remind us of their "Rugby background", even if they were League juniors. Sometimes think it`s by way of explanation if the player is slightly more articulate than the norm.
Rugger`s hegemony in private schools acts as a buffer on how far it can fall. In a further diminished state RU will still be like a pebble in the NRL`s shoe that they just can`t get rid of. AFL don`t have that problem.