First WC winning captain was Scottish, as said before BOG, you are a bore.
And how many times did the GB team play in Scotland?
First WC winning captain was Scottish, as said before BOG, you are a bore.
And how many times did the GB team play in Scotland?
Got nothing to do with anything, a player can come from anywhere and play in whatever pro comp he likes if he chooses to make a living in RL. That means a lot of players have to move and live elsewhere, that also doesn't stop them representing their nation. Scotland RL wasn't formed till 1995, so I find it hard for you to ask the question where they played their games when they didn't play any games at all yet they still had individual players earning a crust in other comps and coming together a few times a year to play representative rugby for Great Britain. I have no problem with that.
These guys played rugby every week for whatever club which employed them in whatever country, they got picked for rep teams if good enough. It seems it's only you and the lot you wholeheartedly back that have a problem with this.
You can't change history no matter how hard you try bog.
Bodisgod, not sure of why you bothered to reply to my post. You didn't address a single point that I made and went off on your own trollsome tangent.
I get it, reading what's in front of you and having a real discussion isn't on your agenda. Good luck.
Wales have been European champs quite a few times and was actually up there beating the likes of France and England when they were powerful enough to take on and beat Australia. Played in Wales quite a few times and had some decent crowds of 30k plus.
Actually I did.
I don't care about you giving us a paragraph on shamateruism. This thread is about rugby league growing internationally. Boot money is all well and good, but there were dozens of dual code internationals from Wales still.
Look at the number of Welsh who went on to play for GB. How often did GB play in Wales? Ever?
There were no home Welsh RL international games for pretty much a quarter of a century.
As helpfully explained above, there was no Scottish team before 1995.
So you had this GB team, and I never said they weren't popular amongst existing rugby league fans in the heartlands, which didn't spread its wings to be inclusive of nations it purported to represent. Furthermore, you had half assed attempts at national teams in these countries. That isn't spreading the international game.
That is plucking talent from other countries and another code (by and large), playing them as pros and not bothering to try and put proper roots down in a country.
RL did make efforts of course. In France obviously. They did go on to call a 4 team competition a World Cup, but again, only haphazardly included a Welsh team. They looked at places like South Africa in the 50s and 60s, and tried to grow. There is no ignorance of this, there is only stating the obvious on the lacklustre and half arsed efforts at growing the game internationally. Lots of primed Welsh players went north, who did very well, but the effort wasn't there to really grow the sport there. Why? IMO as it was a professional game with narrow club interests. How often did Billy Boston play in Wales after he went north? How come after Dave Valentine was taken from union and went on to win a WC as captain, there were no games up in Scotland?
Let's face it if it wasn't for the private school system union would have never have spread anywhere.
Gee. Is that where the name "rugby" comes from?
You might as well say without the so-called private school system the UK would never have become the huge world power that it was in the days of Empire. As the Empire spread, it took its sports and pastimes with it. Cricket, polo, rugby, to name a few. Not all that surprising, really.
And of course rugby league would not have existed, had it not been for the development of the sport of rugby. So we can all thank the private schools system, can't we?
This is just a blatant lie, neither Umaga or Lomu where "forced" to play Rugby and neither were banned form playing League.Union is great at playing the martyr going on about all the players league "stole" from them. Players like Michael O'Connor, Tana Umaga, Jonah Lomu etc were all playing junior league and it wasn't until they went to their private schools where league was banned (oh I wonder why that would be the case) that they took up union.
Then how did it spread in places like NZ and Wales where there its played predominantly in no private schools? just because you are Aussie centric doesn't mean its the same everywhere.Let's face it if it wasn't for the private school system union would have never have spread anywhere.
This is just a blatant lie, neither Umaga or Lomu where "forced" to play Rugby and neither were banned form playing League.
Then how did it spread in places like NZ and Wales where there its played predominantly in no private schools? just because you are Aussie centric doesn't mean its the same everywhere.
And yet the VAST majority of schools allow for and cater for a League team, if there is or was any interest, the lack of interest is not the fault of the school.I'd suggest the latter sentence being, rugby league did not receive the go ahead into many of these non private schools in NZ and Wales and .And it still exists today.
And yet the VAST majority of schools allow for and cater for a League team, if there is or was any interest, the lack of interest is not the fault of the school.
Given there are only a handful of "rugby" schools and only a handful of "League" schools it would be most of them.The vast majority? Would appreciate a breakdown if that's the case.