bobmar28
Bench
- Messages
- 4,304
I love how he just puts this stuff out there, but does not provide any diatribe on the actual policy itself.
Nor does he show exactly WHY this would be bad for clubs nationally, just puts out an 'emotional rebuke'
Honestly, look at the whole issue this way:
if clubs can only provide funding because of pokies, then that's a sad indictment on the clubs themselves.
Uh huh - and those casual players bring in SOOOOO much money for the clubs don't they....
Face the facts, of the alleged 5million people who play the pokies, 60,000 (3%) are 'problem gamblers'. I'd love to see a % of how much 'gambling income' that 3% brings in for the clubs. The fact they're up in arms about the debate suggests it'd be a very large slice.
If you've never seen the way families are totally ruined by problem gambling, then you are not in a position to comment on this issue.
Any club that is dependant on sucking the life out of 60 000 families each and every year DESERVES to die. Bunch of disgraceful merkins.
Clubs that aren't dependant on predatory behaviour upon the weak will certainly survive and find new ways to thrive.
End of story.
How about those "problem gamblers" go somewhere else and leave the rest of us to have a punt without needing a license.