to_ddeath
Coach
- Messages
- 11,904
De Belin, Stockwell, Quinlan, Runciman.
All of which who have naturally improved with each season before they came up to play under Price. Anyone else more established at FG level who has?
T.
De Belin, Stockwell, Quinlan, Runciman.
Yes we can suggest these as mistakes as fans with absolutely zero inside knowledge about the inner workings of the club, salary cap restraints, injuries, discipline issues and individual players actually being considered ready for 1st grade. And if some of these changes had occurred do you believe we would have won more games? Would we have made the 8?
All of which who have naturally improved with each season before they came up to play under Price. Anyone else more established at FG level who has?
T.
Quinlan could have been used earlier,he played in the trials and his versatility is obvious,why put Drinkwater on the bench,could have played with Fien as backup hooker or half,Prior we know shouldn't have been in the centres.
It was clear we weren't going to make the 8 by at least rd 17.Price seems to be too conservative a coach.
Sure Quinlan could have. Funny that he was rubbished on this very forum for being too small earlier in the year though.
It was clear well and truly before rd 17 though we were never going to make the 8.
As far as I am concerned, nothing could have been done selection wise by any coach that would have got us to the 8. Price will get his final chance to show if he can truly coach a quality 1st grade side next as it stands today. If he gets sacked before the season starts then so be it, but I will cheering for the team and whoever coaches next season not death riding the poor bastard.
The common theme with our problems this year is our halves. We had 0 experienced halves and we had no depth to cover our non existant halves.
dont forget Price's plan "A" was to use Kyle Stanley at half.... do you really think if this happened our season would have been any better????
all in all Price has demonstrated time after time that when a decision needs to be made, he either doesnt make it, or simply jumps the wrong way...
dont forget Price's plan "A" was to use Kyle Stanley at half.... do you really think if this happened our season would have been any better????
all in all Price has demonstrated time after time that when a decision needs to be made, he either doesnt make it, or simply jumps the wrong way...
People need to face the facts and accept our roster this year was not a top 8 team. We lacked depth across the park.
Are you happy to face facts and accept that Price is not a top 8 first grade coach?
Here's why you can't win this argument once someone has decided they are anti Price. If you provide an answer to the originally proposed question the response is 'it's nothing to do with Price'.to ddeath said:All of which who have naturally improved with each season before they came up to play under Price. Anyone else more established at FG level who has?
Again, Bennett earned respect without being a whinging moaning twat. Stuart also throws things around, slams his fist on tables, and blames refs. How's that worked out for him?
Last year it was all Hasler, Hasler, Hasler. Dogs buy him a roster and yet still no cupie doll this year.
Toovey has world class halves and centres to work with, the Stewart brothers, Watmough.
Please, it's a cattle no contest.
Here's why you can't win this argument once someone has decided they are anti Price. If you provide an answer to the originally proposed question the response is 'it's nothing to do with Price'.
So, things go to shit, it's on Price.
Things work out, it's not Price.
No win situation.
I know. It's like trying to reason with toddlers. They just don't get it.
Manly are a tougher club then we are, so is Geoff Toovey as a coach - no ifs, buts or maybes.
Your passioned argument BrissyRedV and Bottle typifies what makes the Dragons currently a soft culture. Like all other arguments for him, it is based on :-
A - excuses for Steve Price, in this case the halves situation
and;
B - he's not yet had a fair go, let's give him more time
As one of his critics of his coaching, I like many here, can be swayed by both these points IF they are part of a well constructed argument that INCLUDES...
C - Steve Price's strengths are....
and,
D - Over his 2 years as head coach, Steve Price has improved the team in the following areas...... in spite of missing halves, and adversity through injuries and bad luck.
...that's not behaving like a toddler now is it ?
Price looks for excuses and sugar coating, nonchalant and positive and repetitive whereas Toovey is filthy and straight up honest after a loss demanding answers.