What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Widdop seeks release

Como Connection

First Grade
Messages
6,060
Its pretty harsh to lay the blame fir a teams performance solely at the feet of one or two players. Yes, Norman was a marquee pjayer at the Eels, but not sure we'd be discussing him if it weren't for his off-field antics.
One player doesnt make a team. If we wenr down that road we can say: (last year)
Ponga at the Knights - couldn't get them to the finals.
Cherry-Evans at Manly, the first $6m man, couldn't gef Manly to the finals
The 2 JT's at the Cows couldn't get them to the finals.
The Morris twins at the Dogs etc and the list could go on.
The point is there are many contributing factors that make up a teams performance including game plans, injuries as so forth. But one if the biggest i feel is club culture. So, getting back to the Eels and Norman, to me their club culture was (and still maybe) toxic, both at club management level and player level and has been for several years.
Whilst i'm happy we signed Norman of course I want to see results from him, but only fame day will tell us that. The fact that he was willing to depart the Eels, and not see out his very high salary, and was selected in the QLD emerging SOO squad, says ti je that he wants to cgange and other people can see his talent.
Lets give him the benefif of the doubt before we begin crucifying him.
I'm told from a mate who is connected with the Eels coaching team that Moses and Norman never worked as a combination.
One had to leave.
CC
 

True_Believer

Juniors
Messages
1,840
I don't think anyone would even think of blaming Widdop alone (among the playing group) for the last 5 years of rubbish but as (C) for more than half that time and a marquee playmaker for the entire time, he absolutely should take more blame than anyone else.

Just relax a little. He is now a fullback. I think Pearson and Ravalawa are going to work out well and thus Widdop will compliment the team very well at fullback. He will still be massively overpaid but Mary McFooknuckle is our head coach. This kind of stupidity is the rule rather than the exception.

OK Corey - shouldn't you be training and laying off those lines?
 

blacksafake

First Grade
Messages
9,595
I'm told from a mate who is connected with the Eels coaching team that Moses and Norman never worked as a combination.
One had to leave.
CC
Been told pretty much the same.
Also told that Arthur wanted everything to revolve around Moses who's ego took over & Norman was on the nose from that point on. Norman I still think went ok considering he was being shopped around & playing for a coach who didn't want him. The environment at our club will be a lot healthier than he's been used to.
 

Old Timer

Coach
Messages
17,803
Been told pretty much the same.
Also told that Arthur wanted everything to revolve around Moses who's ego took over & Norman was on the nose from that point on. Norman I still think went ok considering he was being shopped around & playing for a coach who didn't want him. The environment at our club will be a lot healthier than he's been used to.
Maybe Norman took the line on a little too much during his time at the Eels?
Maybe the coach decided to draw the line on his efforts?
I wonder if Norman spun a line to get a gig with us?
I wonder which line he might take during his time with us?
It'll be interesting to see if he is in the starting line with us from Rd 1?
 

possm

Coach
Messages
15,911
Maybe Norman took the line on a little too much during his time at the Eels?
Maybe the coach decided to draw the line on his efforts?
I wonder if Norman spun a line to get a gig with us?
I wonder which line he might take during his time with us?
It'll be interesting to see if he is in the starting line with us from Rd 1?

He'll be there with bells on OT and I'm very sure you will be singing his praises.
 

True_Believer

Juniors
Messages
1,840
Will do Gareth. From back there watch what a decent playmaker can do behind this pack and end 5 years or torture for this clubs supporters.

Lol - your hatred of Widdop knows no bounds. And it's completely unfounded. You are basing it on solely on pay and captaincy. Apparently the position and the role he plays in the team has no bearing. You really have no basis for your argument.
 

Carlton

Juniors
Messages
1,233
Lol - your hatred of Widdop knows no bounds. And it's completely unfounded. You are basing it on solely on pay and captaincy. Apparently the position and the role he plays in the team has no bearing. You really have no basis for your argument.

I think the criticism of Widdop has been a bit more than just his pay and captaincy. Much of the criticism has actually been about the role he is supposed to be playing within the team. As the primary game manager and play maker he has not impressed a number of posters.

Those same posters in general have indicated they think he will be good at fullback ( hardly haters ).
 

Old Timer

Coach
Messages
17,803
Are you having a crack?
So your line is you think he might have a crack at them?
If he takes on the line maybe the opposition might crack?
Hope he can tackle because we don't want our defensive line to crack.
If he fails with us maybe he can be a game show contestant and have a crack at "what's that line"
 
Messages
597
So your line is you think he might have a crack at them?
If he takes on the line maybe the opposition might crack?
Hope he can tackle because we don't want our defensive line to crack.
If he fails with us maybe he can be a game show contestant and have a crack at "what's that line"
Who's line is it anyway?
 

True_Believer

Juniors
Messages
1,840
I think the criticism of Widdop has been a bit more than just his pay and captaincy. Much of the criticism has actually been about the role he is supposed to be playing within the team. As the primary game manager and play maker he has not impressed a number of posters.

Those same posters in general have indicated they think he will be good at fullback ( hardly haters ).

Actually Carlton, the comment was based solely on the conversation I was having with DragonJ and focussed on his comments around Widdop shouldering the blame for any perceived failures during the time he has played for us. I understand some posters believe that Widdop has deficiencies and I too agree consistency is a problem. But this was more to do with accusing a single player for recent results.

So just to clarify the statement you have quoted, I want to point you to this statement from DragonJ

If that isn't true, if he was recruited as a marquee playmaker for them 5 years ago, yes, I agree with you. More blame can and should be placed on his shoulders for Parra's performance than anyone else.

So essentially, from that, I understand he believes that if you aren’t a marquee player, you don’t shoulder the blame – irrespective of the position you play or the role you play in the team. So DragonJ’s argument doesn’t revolve around his skills or his position in the team, it revolves purely around the title “marquee” and as a result the money getting paid. Not to mention we have more than one marquee player in the team and one actually getting paid more than Widdop. However, they don’t need to shoulder the blame somehow? Am I right in in understanding that if Widdop wasn't a marquee player and Hunt was, Hunt would need to take the blame? I understand there is more expectation on a marquee player, however for one to solely take the blame above all other players in the team is ludicrous. To add to this, in previous comments, DragonJ has mentioned the C next to him name as a contributing factor.

Next statement from him refers to Norman performing behind our current pack.

From back there watch what a decent playmaker can do behind this pack and end 5 years or torture for this clubs supporters.

Just to take this year as an example, were we not first on the table when the pack was performing? So in comparison to his first argument that he should take the blame for our performances, why does he not take the credit for our wins? Oh no – that’s given to the pack. But when the pack fails, blame falls to just 1 of the halves. Again, a completely ludicrous stance to take.

It’s not a coincidence that when the pack started to falter we started to lose games. Additionally, it coincided with Widdops injury and Ben Hunt’s loss of confidence. But lets just ignore these factors and focus on an individual.

If you then relate that back to Norman, his history in the halves has been exactly the same. In 17 when the pack was going gang busters, he was performing. In 18 when they weren’t he couldn’t do anything to save the team – and this was potentially when he was considered a marquee. He took the team to a wooden spoon. Great endorsement if what you are looking for is someone to lead the team around and close out games.

Which leads me to my final point. I’ve already pointed out that in the first game they played us last year, they were in an unlosable position – and yet they did. Where was Norman then? For all of the posters on here stating that he’s a great game manager and can close out games – this is the most obvious example that he may not be all we hope him to be. The second when they smashed us, he played fullback – which might even indicate that is where he should play.

So out of all that, I don’t see how DragonJ is basing any of his argument on Widdop’s role (as you say). And suggesting that Norman will do better is completely unfounded given the comparisons. To me at least it looks more like a dislike for the individual more than anything else.

For what it’s worth, I’m keen to see how Norman slots in and whether he can step up for us. Just as I am for all of our new recruits year after year. And this has nothing to do with a preference for Widdop. It has everything to do with team performance as a whole and not placing any blame on one or 2 players. It’s a team sport and the team has to take responsibility for their performance. And more than anything, the buck stops with the coach.
 

getsmarty

Immortal
Messages
34,146
Will they flourish or fail? Here are 10 NRL stars set for a positional change in 2019
NRL Premiership
john_dean.jpg

4c396c8562cca8168c0f1f84bfad0f1c

NRL players set for a positional switch in 2019.Source: FOX SPORTS
With a new season comes new-look line-ups and even different roles.

Foxsports.com.au takes a look at some of the players who are set to feature in new positions — or return to old ones — in 2019.

GARETH WIDDOP (five-eighth to fullback)

In what is likely to be his final season in the NRL, Widdop is set for a positional swap to fullback to accommodate new signing Corey Norman in the halves.

The Englishman has started at fullback in just six NRL games and a further five at international level, so the custodian role is not unfamiliar to him.

He also played a host of games in the No.1 jumper in through the junior grades, and it was in the 2009 under-20s grand final where he helped the Storm to a title with two tries.

Across his top level games at fullback, Widdop has clearly been more of a playmaker with 33.1 possessions per game.

He’s scored five tries and set up another six, along with six linebreaks, 10 linebreak assists and 34 tackle busts.


https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nr...9/news-story/2a342195ad6d0d75bcfa26170295dc5a
 
Messages
2,866
Maybe Norman took the line on a little too much during his time at the Eels?
Maybe the coach decided to draw the line on his efforts?
I wonder if Norman spun a line to get a gig with us?
I wonder which line he might take during his time with us?
It'll be interesting to see if he is in the starting line with us from Rd 1?
Fell for it hook line and sinker...:D
 

Carlton

Juniors
Messages
1,233
Actually Carlton, the comment was based solely on the conversation I was having with DragonJ and focussed on his comments around Widdop shouldering the blame for any perceived failures during the time he has played for us. I understand some posters believe that Widdop has deficiencies and I too agree consistency is a problem. But this was more to do with accusing a single player for recent results.

So just to clarify the statement you have quoted, I want to point you to this statement from DragonJ



So essentially, from that, I understand he believes that if you aren’t a marquee player, you don’t shoulder the blame – irrespective of the position you play or the role you play in the team. So DragonJ’s argument doesn’t revolve around his skills or his position in the team, it revolves purely around the title “marquee” and as a result the money getting paid. Not to mention we have more than one marquee player in the team and one actually getting paid more than Widdop. However, they don’t need to shoulder the blame somehow? Am I right in in understanding that if Widdop wasn't a marquee player and Hunt was, Hunt would need to take the blame? I understand there is more expectation on a marquee player, however for one to solely take the blame above all other players in the team is ludicrous. To add to this, in previous comments, DragonJ has mentioned the C next to him name as a contributing factor.

Next statement from him refers to Norman performing behind our current pack.



Just to take this year as an example, were we not first on the table when the pack was performing? So in comparison to his first argument that he should take the blame for our performances, why does he not take the credit for our wins? Oh no – that’s given to the pack. But when the pack fails, blame falls to just 1 of the halves. Again, a completely ludicrous stance to take.

It’s not a coincidence that when the pack started to falter we started to lose games. Additionally, it coincided with Widdops injury and Ben Hunt’s loss of confidence. But lets just ignore these factors and focus on an individual.

If you then relate that back to Norman, his history in the halves has been exactly the same. In 17 when the pack was going gang busters, he was performing. In 18 when they weren’t he couldn’t do anything to save the team – and this was potentially when he was considered a marquee. He took the team to a wooden spoon. Great endorsement if what you are looking for is someone to lead the team around and close out games.

Which leads me to my final point. I’ve already pointed out that in the first game they played us last year, they were in an unlosable position – and yet they did. Where was Norman then? For all of the posters on here stating that he’s a great game manager and can close out games – this is the most obvious example that he may not be all we hope him to be. The second when they smashed us, he played fullback – which might even indicate that is where he should play.

So out of all that, I don’t see how DragonJ is basing any of his argument on Widdop’s role (as you say). And suggesting that Norman will do better is completely unfounded given the comparisons. To me at least it looks more like a dislike for the individual more than anything else.

For what it’s worth, I’m keen to see how Norman slots in and whether he can step up for us. Just as I am for all of our new recruits year after year. And this has nothing to do with a preference for Widdop. It has everything to do with team performance as a whole and not placing any blame on one or 2 players. It’s a team sport and the team has to take responsibility for their performance. And more than anything, the buck stops with the coach.

Your fingers must be three inches shorter after writing all that.

You are trying to turn this into a black and white argument from DragonJ about who is to blame for a teams performance. He is not saying that a poor team performance is 100% due to the playmaker, he was saying he felt they should carry a larger portion of the blame because they have accepted the responsibility of directing the team.

The cause of our teams poor performance, in the back half of the year, is not due to one factor and I actually think you and DragonJ are both saying this. The main difference seems to be DragonJ feels Widdop was one of the structural problems that needed to be fixed and you feel he was not. Both opinions are acceptable and you both have valid reasons for them.
 

Latest posts

Top