People jump up and down when the Chooks plunder the best players like Teddy and Cronk but little is said about the young kids.
They apply the same principles when getting the young kids into their junior systems, they pay a lot more. In other words they plunder the junior ranks to.
Of course a winning club is a lot more attractive to a kid than a club on struggle street, but at the end of the day money talks. A few years ago West’s had a gun kid, they offered him 10 grand a year just to play in the juniors, Parra offered him 20g,so West’s matched it..along came the Chooks and offered him 80g, so he signed with the Chooks. As it turned out he never kicked on, but that is what your up against.
Anyway they are the bench mark so it a case of, if you can’t beat them join them
Exactly - they talk about bringing up juniors as if a players career starts only when they step onto a field! All those players who debuted with Roosters are not their juniors, they are the cream that Roosters have plundered from other clubs.
However, that’s only part of the story. In order for this strategy to be as successful as it has been, they need to have:
- The ability to identify the best talent and what attributes are likely to translate into first grade footy.
- The coaching staff to develop, enhance and maintain a players’ skill set to prepare them for first grade.
- Pathways for that young talent to follow to get to first grade, and
- The sheer ruthlessness to create cap space when opportunities arrive (Pearce/Nikorima) and the ability to recognise when one of the investments simply wont pay off long term (Hastings/Nikorima).
That, plus (alleged) under the table payments, is the formula to consistent success and the Roosters have nailed it since 2013.
It genuinely burns me that my club failed in all 5 of the areas mentioned above. On the plus side, if any club was going to be that successful at managing their players I’m glad it’s a fake, soulless club like the Roosters that no one really cares about!