Kris_man
Bench
- Messages
- 3,582
you just defied logic with that statement, as it contradicted your previous one 8) .Hahaha fire up Kris_man. It said opposing the majority, not all logic :roll: .
you just defied logic with that statement, as it contradicted your previous one 8) .Hahaha fire up Kris_man. It said opposing the majority, not all logic :roll: .
thickos said:innsaneink said:Have the Raiders offered Withers a 4 year deal?
Four........almost unheard of these days.
What's your source ink?
Carney signed a 4 yr deal with the Raiders earlier this season. Good idea to keep the wolves (re: roosters) from the door.
Raider_69 said:raiders management = #-o #-o
CULLUS.ONLINE said:I guess its just a choice between money (raiders) and friendship (tigers)
:roll: :roll: Raider 69: get your head out of your arse - you can't rely on juniors for short term success. for all we know anyway, Luke Jay might leave to another club anyway, or maybe he will just be an average player. in the modern game, you need as many good players as you can. you can't be stingy, if you've got the money, spend it. if we get Withers for 4 years, we can release Woolford at the end of next year anyway, freeing up our cap and our options.Raider_69 said:to be honest id perfer him at the tigers
they need him, IMO we dont, Luke Jay is coming up and looks to be a more than compitent hooker for when Germ retires and we have a wealth of halves talent if they are just give a go
a waste of money IMO, i wouldnt see him playing a large role in first grade, perfer to save the money for someone major next season, we have got ALOT of people coming off contract, we will need all the cash we can get
Kris_man said::roll: :roll: Raider 69: get your head out of your arse - you can't rely on juniors for short term success. for all we know anyway, Luke Jay might leave to another club anyway, or maybe he will just be an average player. in the modern game, you need as many good players as you can. you can't be stingy, if you've got the money, spend it. if we get Withers for 4 years, we can release Woolford at the end of next year anyway, freeing up our cap and our options.Raider_69 said:to be honest id perfer him at the tigers
they need him, IMO we dont, Luke Jay is coming up and looks to be a more than compitent hooker for when Germ retires and we have a wealth of halves talent if they are just give a go
a waste of money IMO, i wouldnt see him playing a large role in first grade, perfer to save the money for someone major next season, we have got ALOT of people coming off contract, we will need all the cash we can get
woohoo!! :mrgreen: you don't know how rare that is, Chief \\Agree with Kris
he maybe, but i say cross that bridge when we come to it, id prefer to take the risk and then if all falls through buy someone that is a tad better than withers
i say sign him, but for 2, 4 years on a high contract is too much these days IMO