Phil McGrawhan
Coach
- Messages
- 15,665
He's WAR weary.I doubt anyone would argue things are going swimmingly with the NRL competition at the moment but "such bad shape"? f**k you're a drama queen.
BATTLE fatigued .
He's WAR weary.I doubt anyone would argue things are going swimmingly with the NRL competition at the moment but "such bad shape"? f**k you're a drama queen.
You want to get rid of the refs?Now that we have a womens comp we need to get rid of women in league round and those horrid pink jerseys.
Near certainty? Speculation? Nice try champ.It's called speculating, but congratulations on being a hero after the fact. You must feel special.
No existing NRL teams, unless clubs want to enter a joint venture arrangement.
YEAR 1:
Sydney 1
Sydney 2
Brisbane 1
NSW Regional 1
NZ
Expansion area 1 (eg Perth/PNG)
YEAR 2 - Add 2x new teams:
Brisbane 2 or QLD Regional 1
Expansion area 2
YEAR 3 - Add 2x new teams:
Sydney 3
Melbourne/Canberra
End result is a 10 team comp that can be played over 9 weeks (launching after Origin series)
Now that we have a womens comp we need to get rid of women in league round and those horrid pink jerseys.
It would be nice if the women’s competition was afforded the very significant advantage of NRL club names! Another failure from the NRL! They could have phased in clubs as the womens comp got more established?instead they completely waste the significant advantage of existing and well known club names! Amazingly innept thinking again from the NRL.
Unless I have missed something, that is the way they are going.
Don't think so? Just read an earlier post in this thread and it described some convoluted representative set up? Abysmal tact from the NRL if that's what's planned!
Pretty sure thats just the posters idea.
Hope so! Its seemed reasonably detailed and mentioned 6 initial teams? Then went on from that? I'm thinking knowing the way the NRL does things that this may be what's happening?
I'm not suggesting that the "establishment" shouldn't support it, only that any women's comp shouldn't be connected to the men's comp, the NRL it's self should back it, but not as an extension of the NRL competition or clubs, they should start the women's comp with the intention that eventually it would be it's own self sustaining product that survives off it's own income and has it's own fans, has it's own TV rights and/or streaming deals, has it's own sponsors, etc, and doesn't need anything from the men's league to survive.
I also don't buy that the women's teams would need to be supported by the men's clubs in the beginning to be able to assemble the infrastructure necessary to be functioning clubs in a national competition, firstly there're are plenty of companies that'd be interested in sponsoring a women's competition/team that wouldn't traditionally be interested in supporting a men's competition/team, but more importantly with the extra grants that the NRL clubs will demand to run their women's teams you could start up a collection of modest new clubs in their own right, so why not cut out the middle man who's not really interested in growing or supporting the women's game apart from the good PR it provides them and give that money straight to a set of new women's clubs whos' only interested is in seeing the women's game grow and become as big as possible in it's own right, if it is really a concern that they won't be able to set themselves up to a reasonable degree with the money on offer then give them a couple of big grants to start with.
Another problem with the Women's comp being connected to the men's that hasn't really been discussed in any detail here, is that if the women's comp is connected to the men's clubs it inherently saddles the women's comp with all the problems that the men's comp has, but namely it completely unnecessarily saddles them with being restricted to the east coast of the country and over saturated in the Sydney market.
If we are starting a new national competition, then we should start it so that it has the best chance of being a success and that means starting out with teams representing the major capitals, not teams representing the suburbs of Sydney with some blow ins.
It will definitely be based on current clubs.
When you state 'based' is that code for other clubs having input to the participating teams but the team name and colours are different from the club or perhaps a combination of involved club colours/logos etc? The latter would be diabolical , confusing and wasting established club brands. Hope I'm wrong!?
As far as I know it'll be womens versions of the teams so for example only: Womens Sharks, Womens Panthers etc.
I’m gonna buy me a Sydney 1 jerseyNo existing NRL teams, unless clubs want to enter a joint venture arrangement.
YEAR 1:
Sydney 1
Sydney 2
Brisbane 1
NSW Regional 1
NZ
Expansion area 1 (eg Perth/PNG)
YEAR 2 - Add 2x new teams:
Brisbane 2 or QLD Regional 1
Expansion area 2
YEAR 3 - Add 2x new teams:
Sydney 3
Melbourne/Canberra
End result is a 10 team comp that can be played over 9 weeks (launching after Origin series)
I’m gonna buy me a Sydney 1 jersey
They said the same thing about Big Bash League...When you state 'based' is that code for other clubs having input to the participating teams but the team name and colours are different from the club or perhaps a combination of involved club colours/logos etc? The latter would be diabolical , confusing and wasting established club brands. Hope I'm wrong!?