What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Women's NRL

mistertaylor

Juniors
Messages
415
No existing NRL teams, unless clubs want to enter a joint venture arrangement.

YEAR 1:
Sydney 1
Sydney 2
Brisbane 1
NSW Regional 1
NZ
Expansion area 1 (eg Perth/PNG)

YEAR 2 - Add 2x new teams:
Brisbane 2 or QLD Regional 1
Expansion area 2

YEAR 3 - Add 2x new teams:
Sydney 3
Melbourne/Canberra

End result is a 10 team comp that can be played over 9 weeks (launching after Origin series)
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
No existing NRL teams, unless clubs want to enter a joint venture arrangement.

YEAR 1:
Sydney 1
Sydney 2
Brisbane 1
NSW Regional 1
NZ
Expansion area 1 (eg Perth/PNG)

YEAR 2 - Add 2x new teams:
Brisbane 2 or QLD Regional 1
Expansion area 2

YEAR 3 - Add 2x new teams:
Sydney 3
Melbourne/Canberra

End result is a 10 team comp that can be played over 9 weeks (launching after Origin series)

? Would have thought using the well established club brand names be more attractive? People can readily identify with existing club names and get on board straight away! This representative naming path is not fan friendly for the game. Instead of capitalising on established brands the NRL choose to both confuse and have the established club name advantage nullified? A retrograde step by the NRL for the womens rugby league.
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
Now that we have a womens comp we need to get rid of women in league round and those horrid pink jerseys.

It would be nice if the women’s competition was afforded the very significant advantage of NRL club names! Another failure from the NRL! They could have phased in clubs as the womens comp got more established?instead they completely waste the significant advantage of existing and well known club names! Amazingly innept thinking again from the NRL.
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,972
It would be nice if the women’s competition was afforded the very significant advantage of NRL club names! Another failure from the NRL! They could have phased in clubs as the womens comp got more established?instead they completely waste the significant advantage of existing and well known club names! Amazingly innept thinking again from the NRL.

Unless I have missed something, that is the way they are going.
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
Unless I have missed something, that is the way they are going.

Don't think so? Just read an earlier post in this thread and it described some convoluted representative set up? Abysmal tact from the NRL if that's what's planned!
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
Pretty sure thats just the posters idea.

Hope so! Its seemed reasonably detailed and mentioned 6 initial teams? Then went on from that? I'm thinking knowing the way the NRL does things that this may be what's happening?
 

OldPanther

Coach
Messages
13,404
Hope so! Its seemed reasonably detailed and mentioned 6 initial teams? Then went on from that? I'm thinking knowing the way the NRL does things that this may be what's happening?

It will definitely be based on current clubs.
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
I'm not suggesting that the "establishment" shouldn't support it, only that any women's comp shouldn't be connected to the men's comp, the NRL it's self should back it, but not as an extension of the NRL competition or clubs, they should start the women's comp with the intention that eventually it would be it's own self sustaining product that survives off it's own income and has it's own fans, has it's own TV rights and/or streaming deals, has it's own sponsors, etc, and doesn't need anything from the men's league to survive.

I also don't buy that the women's teams would need to be supported by the men's clubs in the beginning to be able to assemble the infrastructure necessary to be functioning clubs in a national competition, firstly there're are plenty of companies that'd be interested in sponsoring a women's competition/team that wouldn't traditionally be interested in supporting a men's competition/team, but more importantly with the extra grants that the NRL clubs will demand to run their women's teams you could start up a collection of modest new clubs in their own right, so why not cut out the middle man who's not really interested in growing or supporting the women's game apart from the good PR it provides them and give that money straight to a set of new women's clubs whos' only interested is in seeing the women's game grow and become as big as possible in it's own right, if it is really a concern that they won't be able to set themselves up to a reasonable degree with the money on offer then give them a couple of big grants to start with.

Another problem with the Women's comp being connected to the men's that hasn't really been discussed in any detail here, is that if the women's comp is connected to the men's clubs it inherently saddles the women's comp with all the problems that the men's comp has, but namely it completely unnecessarily saddles them with being restricted to the east coast of the country and over saturated in the Sydney market.
If we are starting a new national competition, then we should start it so that it has the best chance of being a success and that means starting out with teams representing the major capitals, not teams representing the suburbs of Sydney with some blow ins.

I see the 'oversaturated Sydney ' market thinking is raring its ugly head again! Tell the 10 AFL clubs in Melbourne with 1million less people to draw from that line! AUSTRALIAS largest city Sydney and greater Sydney is not oversaturated. Do the maths 5million divided 8.5 NRL clubs equals almost 600000 potential fans per club. Its only oversaturated if you think the game of rugby league isn't worthy of those numbers. Very disrespectful and ignorant train of thought going on by some fans that either cant count or dont find RL attractive enough to capture such a population with its rich history and immensely well known clubs.
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
It will definitely be based on current clubs.

When you state 'based' is that code for other clubs having input to the participating teams but the team name and colours are different from the club or perhaps a combination of involved club colours/logos etc? The latter would be diabolical , confusing and wasting established club brands. Hope I'm wrong!?
 

OldPanther

Coach
Messages
13,404
When you state 'based' is that code for other clubs having input to the participating teams but the team name and colours are different from the club or perhaps a combination of involved club colours/logos etc? The latter would be diabolical , confusing and wasting established club brands. Hope I'm wrong!?

As far as I know it'll be womens versions of the teams so for example only: Womens Sharks, Womens Panthers etc.
 

Stallion

First Grade
Messages
7,467
As far as I know it'll be womens versions of the teams so for example only: Womens Sharks, Womens Panthers etc.

Hopefully these teams are the initial phase with additional NRL teams to follow. Otherwise the organisers are wasting established club fan bases. Simple as that!
 

Eion

First Grade
Messages
8,034
No existing NRL teams, unless clubs want to enter a joint venture arrangement.

YEAR 1:
Sydney 1
Sydney 2
Brisbane 1
NSW Regional 1
NZ
Expansion area 1 (eg Perth/PNG)

YEAR 2 - Add 2x new teams:
Brisbane 2 or QLD Regional 1
Expansion area 2

YEAR 3 - Add 2x new teams:
Sydney 3
Melbourne/Canberra

End result is a 10 team comp that can be played over 9 weeks (launching after Origin series)
I’m gonna buy me a Sydney 1 jersey
 

mistertaylor

Juniors
Messages
415
When you state 'based' is that code for other clubs having input to the participating teams but the team name and colours are different from the club or perhaps a combination of involved club colours/logos etc? The latter would be diabolical , confusing and wasting established club brands. Hope I'm wrong!?
They said the same thing about Big Bash League...
 
Top