doovepop said:you used your brain yay yay yay
first off graphics are crap so far they are to cartoony
5 stadiums haha
and players bouncing off each other doesn't look real.
and alot more stupid things.
has more going FOR it than AGAINST it
5 stadiums - the same as JLR, the benchmark of all rugby sims (whther league or union)
graphics looking cartoony - well they are better than JLR and if it plays the same it will be better than JLR, hence the new benchmark will then be WCR.
if u didnt like JLR i am wasting my time
if u liked JLR and u cant see the potential this game has being made by the same group of people as JLR, ur lost
by the way for all those sceptic - more facts
Sidhe hired a guy on contract to help make NRL, and Mario was one to quickly point out, that this guy was part of the team that made JLR.
Why was Mario so quick to point out this guy made JLR?
Cause he also knows its the benchmark, and used this info, to promote the potential of NRL, simply coz of the programmer he hired was part of team JLR.
Well the diff between that and this game - the whole team of JLR made WCR, not one employee that sidhe could get their hands on.
first off graphics are crap so far they are to cartoony
5 stadiums haha
and players bouncing off each other doesn't look real.
and alot more stupid things.
Fairleigh Good! said:Are you lot talking about the Jonah Lomu Rugby on the Playstation 1?
If so, you are letting nostalgic forgetfulness drift over your eyes. The game was alright for its time but wasn't a particularly great game. It's reviews weren't too hot either getting mostly 7's. Plus it doesn't stand the test of time at all, I played it last night on a 10 on one Playstation disc and its pretty bad, certainly not good enough to cause a distraction.
I certainly wouldn't be making WCR a success simply because the same people are making it.
Fairleigh Good! said:Are you lot talking about the Jonah Lomu Rugby on the Playstation 1?
If so, you are letting nostalgic forgetfulness drift over your eyes. The game was alright for its time but wasn't a particularly great game. It's reviews weren't too hot either getting mostly 7's. Plus it doesn't stand the test of time at all, I played it last night on a 10 on one Playstation disc and its pretty bad, certainly not good enough to cause a distraction.
I certainly wouldn't be making WCR a success simply because the same people are making it.
[furrycat] said:You CANNOT say because a producer has made a "good" game in the past, that the next will be the same. EA Sports made great games a few years ago at the moment they suck. If I were to say that Rugby League was going to be like Sidhe's other projects, do you think I would have bought it? I think not... Don't judge a book by its cover
Furrycat you stupid pussy
a. Sidhes other projects arent rugby league, so no dont compare
b. Swordfishes other projects are Rugby union (JLR), so u can compare
c. have already stated that Sidhe went out of their way to get "McCabe", from JLR to make NRL..........why coz JLR is the benchmark
d. If NRL is good in your eyes then "McCabes" input was productive, then yes I can confidently say this new game will be better than JLR, cause "McCabes" still has what it take if NRL is good.
e. EA sports lost the plot gameplay wise coz of the mass of options flooded into their games, Swordfish have already stated WCR has the same options as JLR, nothing drastic like 70 stadiums, to ensure gameplay doesnt suffer.
f. I judge books by their authors and in this case JLR authors are WCR's aswell...I can safely say, I dont revert to the cover, I listen to the author