are you serious???? :?....not that I don't disagree with you, but it would of been political and career suicide, in hindsight..it doesn't really matter now, but can you imagine the uproar if it happened???
Sure there would have been a lot of outrage but if they truly are the problem, your results aftert that would speak for itself.
Just out of curiosity, who wouldn't have copped it? If the board cared about what we thought, Kearney would be gone already!
If you knew you weren't allowed to truly get what you wanted (even though we have been told he has complete control) why would you take the job as a rookie? Hs career is over if he continues this way........[/QUOTE]
good question..at the end of the day it's still a prestigious gig for any budding coach but if SK looked back now he probably should of seen what else was out there...
IMO Hindy was told his contract would not be renewed, therefore his decision was made for him. I don't remember complaining and I honestly believe that if the coach wanted him gone that is his prerogative.
Same will go for Hayne, if he truly is the problem, f**k him off, I want the club to move forward and if he is stopping it, get rid of him.
The coach will live and die by his decisions, realistically how many fans would the Eels actually lose by getting rid of Hayne? None!
How many would be upset? Plenty, but they would get over it once the club started winning as at the end of the day, the majority of fans who don't really follow the game as closely as say the people on this forum, they just want to win games or see that we are competitive.........
My personal opinion is that SK is out of his depth and couldn't coach an under 12's team to a win, however he has a contract and I am happy for the club to honor it, I am not calling for his sacking, he has till the end of next year to decide his own fate.........it ain't looking good for him but he still has at least 39 games to prove to the board that he has a future with us.
