WRL - RU try again

[Disinterested third party]

None by World Rugby, just journalists making up names and being hysterically jumped on in here.

https://www.world.rugby/news/403130 "Nations Championship."

Reporting what multiple news sources, some reputable, say is not being ‘hysterical’. The only thing hysterical is your constant defence of union in here.

 

[Te Kaha]

Reporting what multiple news sources, some reputable, say is not being ‘hysterical’. The only thing hysterical is your constant defence of union in here.

Aww diddums Calixite.

It was posted on the very first page of this thread that it was A "World League" and wouldn't be called that. But you had to double down and get it wrong again. Nobody bothered or waited to see what it was actually going to be called but jumped on their high horse anyway, you included. That's being hysterical. even in January it was announced that the proposal was being called the "Nations championship" it didn't change a thing.

 

[Disinterested third party]

The only one doubling down is you with yet more hysterical support for the rah rah. Don’t go changing, scrubber.

 

[Whatwhere]

Reporting what multiple news sources, some reputable, say is not being ‘hysterical’. The only thing hysterical is your constant defence of union in here.

But, but, but...what happened to it being called 'World Rugby League'? Could the title 'World League' just have been a working title for the concept all along? Hmm...I guess we'll never know.

 

[BODISGOD]

Are we still surprised?

I just dont know why we think RU should be playing fair and being nice. Are we f*cking children?

I don't think you get what is going on in the clip.

 

[Disinterested third party]

I happen to know for a fact that the RLIF objected to the use of the name from the highest levels. Looks like it got some traction.

And a handful of union trolls crying about it ‘but, but, but’ is as relevant as shyte on the bottom of a birdcage.

And deserves about the same amount of attention.

 

[Whatwhere]

I happen to know for a fact that the RLIF objected to the use of the name from the highest levels. Looks like it got some traction.

And a handful of union trolls crying about it ‘but, but, but’ is as relevant as shyte on the bottom of a birdcage.

And deserves about the same amount of attention.

I was mocking you not crying about it. Are you seriously too thick to tell the difference? I can also tell you that WR wouldn't have given too shits about anything the RLIF said. RFL unlikely. NRL maybe but RLIF not a f**king chance.

 

[Disinterested third party]

I was mocking you not crying about it. Are you seriously too thick to tell the difference? I can also tell you that WR wouldn't have given too shits about anything the RLIF said. RFL unlikely. NRL maybe but RLIF not a f**king chance.

No I just disregard multiple sign in union trolls like you and bodisshyte.
And they clearly did.

 

[Disinterested third party]

‘Too’ shits. Another union genius at work.

 

[Whatwhere]

No I just disregard multiple sign in union trolls like you and bodisshyte.
And they clearly did.

I've never been one for multiple logins. This is my only one. So when I call you thick you can trust that it's purely my opinion and not some alter ego.

 

[Whatwhere]

‘Too’ shits. Another union genius at work.

Good for you. You found a spelling mistake. Still doesn't detract from the fact that you seem either unwilling or incapable of comprehending the difference beginning a working title and something that has been officially ratified. Which for the record is nothing at present.

 

[Disinterested third party]

I've never been one for multiple logins. This is my only one. So when I call you thick you can trust that it's purely my opinion and not some alter ego.

Criticising someone else’s intelligence. Pure gold. Get back to me when you can tell the difference between two, too and to.

 

[Whatwhere]

Criticising someone else’s intelligence. Pure gold. Get back to me when you can tell the difference between two, too and to.

There's a difference between a spelling mistake on my behalf and what constitutes intelligence. Comprehension being one of them. Something you clearly have overlooked in order to maintain a fairly narrow focus.

 

[Disinterested third party]

Nah not buying it. You’re as thick as shit and a union supporter to boot. Things that intrinsically go together.

 

[Stallion]

Nah not buying it. You’re as thick as shit and a union supporter to boot. Things that intrinsically go together.

Ultimately you are correct : The union supporter at large has fundamentally been duped/indoctrinated into a false belief in its code. If the world was a fair place and natural justice prevailed:rugby league would be immensely popular (in fact rivaling soccer ) .But we know the deceit and sly actions of union toward rugby league have made such an outcome extremely difficult. So overall your summation is valid!

 

[Whatwhere]

Nah not buying it. You’re as thick as shit and a union supporter to boot. Things that intrinsically go together.

If it helps you feel like a winner. Whatever.

 

[Disinterested third party]

That was worth dragging your sorry arse back here...

 

[Hello, I'm The Doctor]

I don't think you get what is going on in the clip.

My bad, my VPN cut out after the intro...

It does prove though that RL and RU are impossible to tell apart for anyone not born into it. You can even hear it in the interview.

"Here is a Rugby coach and here are 2 Rugby players."
"We have one more qualifier to get into the World cup of Pro Rugby, Rugby League"

Anyone hearing "League" in that interview is not thinking "different sport" they are thinking "Rugby Competition". In terms of advertising RU, we are they best thing to ever happen to them...