Blah blah, the Rumble hasn't always resulted in a one on one match between Champion and Rumble winner for years now.
This isn't anything new.
RR has never guaranteed 1 on 1, ever. They never say it.
It's just to get a shot at the title at wrestlemania.
It isn't even the main event sometimes.
I don't get why people think that.
Yes yes I know, it has been stated previously. However when we had 2 titles, the WWE and WHC, there was usually at least 1 title match at WM that was 1 vs 1. WWE made monumental f**k ups - last year if it wasn't for fan backlash, DB wouldn't have turned heel, would've been #30, and would've won the RR. The whole Batista thing was a waste of time and money.
This year, same shit. Everyone wanted DB to win. Fans had a backlash after RR won it, and they again have to make this triple threat thing happen. It's like... they don't f**king listen to what the universe wants, and, I know it might sound cliche, but listening to the WWE fans is what's "BEST FOR BUSINESS" FFS.