Your 2004 End Of Season Table

[lolesi]

1. Penrith
2. Warriors
3. Raiders
4. Rossters
5. knights (depnds on johns)
6. Storm
7. Parramatta
8. Cowboys [-o&lt, post:

9. Broncos
10. drgaons
11. Dogs
13. Tigers
14. Manly
15. Souths[/quote"]

no such number as 12 eh??

and its good to see so many people writing of the sharks and dogs

And Ron i dont know how you can say we will lack depth this year as we blooded more youngsters then anyother club except souths last year... pretty stupid call

 

[MadDogMason]

yep true...Let em rite us off it makes us play a totally different agressive game of footy :mrgreen:

 

[AJ]

1. Panthers (Won't win as many games but will still win comp)
2. Raiders (Players from 2003 have gainned experience to go further)
3. Roosters (Pressure on and off field will get to them)
4. Warriors (Have similar season to 2003)
5. Bulldogs (Lost a couple of players, new combinations will take time to gel)
6. Manly (Surprisingly bought well during the off-season. A new sense of vigger throughout the club)
7. Newcastle (Relying too much on Joey Johns. Will jag enough wins to limp into finals)
8. Tigers (Like Manly, have bought well during the off-season)

9. Broncos (Like late 2003, relying too much on Tallis, Lockyer and Webke)
10. Eels (Player exodus with Crusher will show in it's depth)
11. Cowboys (Similar season to 2003)
12. Dragons (Continue to slide down ladder)
13. Storm (Will loose too many close matches and that will show on the ladder)
14. Sharks (Still have Brett Kimmorley)
15. Souths (No hope, no plans, no chance)

AJ

 

[Raider_69]

1. Panthers (Won't win as many games but will still win comp)
2. Raiders (Players from 2003 have gainned experience to go further)
3. Roosters (Pressure on and off field will get to them)
4. Warriors (Have similar season to 2003)
5. Bulldogs (Lost a couple of players, new combinations will take time to gel)
6. Manly (Surprisingly bought well during the off-season. A new sense of vigger throughout the club)
7. Newcastle (Relying too much on Joey Johns. Will jag enough wins to limp into finals)
8. Tigers (Like Manly, have bought well during the off-season)

9. Broncos (Like late 2003, relying too much on Tallis, Lockyer and Webke)
10. Eels (Player exodus with Crusher will show in it's depth)
11. Cowboys (Similar season to 2003)
12. Dragons (Continue to slide down ladder)
13. Storm (Will loose too many close matches and that will show on the ladder)
14. Sharks (Still have Brett Kimmorley)
15. Souths (No hope, no plans, no chance)

AJ

that is acually a pretty good table, im not sure about the Sharks and Manly.. Manly to 14th, Storm to 6th and and sharks 13th

 

[Evilgrowler]

You're insane if you think the Broncos will miss the 8.

 

[AJ]

You're insane if you think the Broncos will miss the 8.

You're deluded if you expect to have good times all the time.

AJ

 

[MadDogMason]

Thats a great table AJ

 

[MadDogMason]

Thats a great table AJ :mrgreen:

 

[Terminator]

1. Newcastle
2. Sydney
3. Canterbury
4. Penrith
5. NZ
6. Canberra
7. St. George-
-Illawarra
8. Nth. Qld
9. Wests Tigers
10. Brisbane
11. Melbourne
12. Souths
13. Parramatta
14. Manly
15. Cronulla

 

[Terminator]

6. Manly (Surprisingly bought well during the off-season. A new sense of vigger throughout the club)
AJ[/quote]
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[SaintTPP]

1. Raiders
2. NZ
3. Penrith
4. Roosters
5. Dogs
6. Dragons
7. Knights
8. Brisbane
9. Tigers
10. Parra
11. Manly
12. Qld
13. Storm
14. Souths
15. Sharks

 

[Anonymous]

15. Melbourne

:lol: :lol:

:roll:

 

[ball boy]

1. Raiders
2. NZ
3. Penrith
4. Roosters
5. Dogs
6. Dragons
7. Knights
8. Brisbane
9. Tigers
10. Parra
11. Manly
12. Qld
13. Storm
14. Souths
15. Sharks

that is a great table should be about right

 

[Terminator]

that is a great table should be about right[/quote]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[Anonymous]

that is a great table should be about right

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]

I'll join you there Terminator.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[Red Bear]

Roosters
Raiders
Warriors
Panthers(Grand final winner from top 4)
Knights
Parramatta
Dogs
Tigers
Dragons
Bronco's
Melbourne
Nth Queensland
Souths
Cronulla
Manly

 

[AJ]

1. Newcastle

Drugcastle on top? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

AJ

 

[Tigertread]

12. Qld

Is this a new team?

 

[ball boy]

12. Qld

Is this a new team?

I think he means North Queensland mate

 

[Terminator]

1. Newcastle

Drugcastle on top? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

AJ

Thats a bit old now isnt it?
Anyway have fun not watching your team in the finals again.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: